MRI Technologist Pay

American Fork vs Ogden: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between American Fork, UT and Ogden, UT. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

American Fork, UT
$97,201
$46.73/hr
Ogden, UT
$89,643
$43.09/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAmerican Fork, UTOgden, UT
Median Salary$97,201$89,643
Hourly Rate$46.73$43.09
Entry Level (P10)$71,230$87,868
25th Percentile$82,540$88,572
75th Percentile$104,971$108,076
Top Earner (P90)$122,671$115,354
Total Employed660
Side-by-side bar chart comparing American Fork ($97,201) and Ogden ($89,643) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.American ForkOgdenMedian Salary$97,201$89,643Entry Level (P10)$71,230$87,868Top Earner (P90)$122,671$115,354US Median $100,283

Verdict

American Fork, UT offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Ogden.

The salary gap between American Fork and Ogden is $7,558 (8.43%). American Fork's median is -3.07% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in American Fork spans $51,441,Ogden spans $27,486. American Fork has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

American Fork
P10 (Entry)$71,230
P25$82,540
Median$97,201
P75$104,971
P90 (Top)$122,671
Ogden
P10 (Entry)$87,868
P25$88,572
Median$89,643
P75$108,076
P90 (Top)$115,354

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, American Fork ($99,084 effective) pays 10.92% more than Ogden ($89,331 effective).

American Fork
Nominal: $97,201
CoL Index: 98.1
Adjusted: $99,084
Ogden
Nominal: $89,643
CoL Index: 100.349
Adjusted: $89,331

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose American Fork if…

  • Higher median salary ($97,201/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($122,671)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $99,084)
  • You prefer the Utah area and lifestyle

Choose Ogden if…

  • Larger job market (60 employed)
  • You prefer the Utah area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in American Fork grew 22.4% from 2024 to 2025, compared to -19.3% growth in Ogden over the same period.

American Fork, UT

+22.4%

$75,603 (2024) → $92,546 (2025)

Ogden, UT

+-19.3%

$105,820 (2019) → $85,350 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: American Fork or Ogden?

American Fork has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $97,201/year, compared to Ogden at $89,643/year — a difference of $7,558 (8.43%).

What is the hourly rate difference between American Fork and Ogden?

American Fork magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $46.73/hr while Ogden hygienists earn $43.09/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from American Fork to Ogden as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing American Fork and Ogden. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: American Fork = $99,084, Ogden = $89,331), job availability (6 vs 60 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in American Fork vs Ogden?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $71,230 in American Fork and $87,868 in Ogden. The Ogden area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov