MRI Technologist Pay

Anderson vs Charleston: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Anderson, SC and Charleston, SC. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Anderson, SC
$92,808
$44.62/hr
Charleston, SC
$89,559
$43.06/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAnderson, SCCharleston, SC
Median Salary$92,808$89,559
Hourly Rate$44.62$43.06
Entry Level (P10)$69,088$69,299
25th Percentile$79,316$81,083
75th Percentile$100,717$98,592
Top Earner (P90)$117,932$98,592
Total Employed5170
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Anderson ($92,808) and Charleston ($89,559) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.AndersonCharlestonMedian Salary$92,808$89,559Entry Level (P10)$69,088$69,299Top Earner (P90)$117,932$98,592US Median $100,283

Verdict

Anderson, SC offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Charleston.

The salary gap between Anderson and Charleston is $3,249 (3.63%). Anderson's median is -7.45% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Anderson spans $48,844,Charleston spans $29,293. Anderson has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Anderson
P10 (Entry)$69,088
P25$79,316
Median$92,808
P75$100,717
P90 (Top)$117,932
Charleston
P10 (Entry)$69,299
P25$81,083
Median$89,559
P75$98,592
P90 (Top)$98,592

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Anderson ($101,430 effective) pays 14.34% more than Charleston ($88,706 effective).

Anderson
Nominal: $92,808
CoL Index: 91.5
Adjusted: $101,430
Charleston
Nominal: $89,559
CoL Index: 100.962
Adjusted: $88,706

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Anderson if…

  • Higher median salary ($92,808/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($117,932)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $101,430)
  • You prefer the South Carolina area and lifestyle

Choose Charleston if…

  • Larger job market (170 employed)
  • You prefer the South Carolina area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Anderson grew 35.2% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 28.0% growth in Charleston over the same period.

Anderson, SC

+35.2%

$65,378 (2024) → $88,363 (2025)

Charleston, SC

+28.0%

$66,610 (2019) → $85,270 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Anderson or Charleston?

Anderson has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $92,808/year, compared to Charleston at $89,559/year — a difference of $3,249 (3.63%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Anderson and Charleston?

Anderson magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $44.62/hr while Charleston hygienists earn $43.06/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Anderson to Charleston as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Anderson and Charleston. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Anderson = $101,430, Charleston = $88,706), job availability (5 vs 170 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Anderson vs Charleston?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $69,088 in Anderson and $69,299 in Charleston. The Charleston area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov