MRI Technologist Pay

Aspen Hill vs Baltimore: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Aspen Hill, MD and Baltimore, MD. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Aspen Hill, MD
$111,130
$53.43/hr
Baltimore, MD
$108,034
$51.94/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAspen Hill, MDBaltimore, MD
Median Salary$111,130$108,034
Hourly Rate$53.43$51.94
Entry Level (P10)$79,975$90,504
25th Percentile$93,678$100,965
75th Percentile$122,591$118,096
Top Earner (P90)$145,814$125,595
Total Employed8350
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Aspen Hill ($111,130) and Baltimore ($108,034) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Aspen HillBaltimoreMedian Salary$111,130$108,034Entry Level (P10)$79,975$90,504Top Earner (P90)$145,814$125,595US Median $100,283

Verdict

Aspen Hill, MD offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Baltimore.

The salary gap between Aspen Hill and Baltimore is $3,096 (2.87%). Aspen Hill's median is +10.82% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Aspen Hill spans $65,839,Baltimore spans $35,091. Aspen Hill has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Aspen Hill
P10 (Entry)$79,975
P25$93,678
Median$111,130
P75$122,591
P90 (Top)$145,814
Baltimore
P10 (Entry)$90,504
P25$100,965
Median$108,034
P75$118,096
P90 (Top)$125,595

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Baltimore ($103,395 effective) pays 1.69% more than Aspen Hill ($101,674 effective).

Aspen Hill
Nominal: $111,130
CoL Index: 109.3
Adjusted: $101,674
Baltimore
Nominal: $108,034
CoL Index: 104.487
Adjusted: $103,395

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Aspen Hill if…

  • Higher median salary ($111,130/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($145,814)
  • You prefer the Maryland area and lifestyle

Choose Baltimore if…

  • Larger job market (350 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $103,395)
  • You prefer the Maryland area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Aspen Hill grew 6.1% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 35.5% growth in Baltimore over the same period.

Aspen Hill, MD

+6.1%

$99,735 (2024) → $105,808 (2025)

Baltimore, MD

+35.5%

$75,900 (2019) → $102,860 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Aspen Hill or Baltimore?

Aspen Hill has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $111,130/year, compared to Baltimore at $108,034/year — a difference of $3,096 (2.87%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Aspen Hill and Baltimore?

Aspen Hill magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $53.43/hr while Baltimore hygienists earn $51.94/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Aspen Hill to Baltimore as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Aspen Hill and Baltimore. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Aspen Hill = $101,674, Baltimore = $103,395), job availability (8 vs 350 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Aspen Hill vs Baltimore?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $79,975 in Aspen Hill and $90,504 in Baltimore. The Baltimore area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov