MRI Technologist Pay

Atlanta vs Woodstock: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Atlanta, GA and Woodstock, GA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Atlanta, GA
$105,219
$50.58/hr
Woodstock, GA
$91,812
$44.14/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAtlanta, GAWoodstock, GA
Median Salary$105,219$91,812
Hourly Rate$50.58$44.14
Entry Level (P10)$87,206$68,092
25th Percentile$90,662$81,830
75th Percentile$111,206$99,594
Top Earner (P90)$128,903$116,140
Total Employed1,0105
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Atlanta ($105,219) and Woodstock ($91,812) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.AtlantaWoodstockMedian Salary$105,219$91,812Entry Level (P10)$87,206$68,092Top Earner (P90)$128,903$116,140US Median $100,283

Verdict

Atlanta, GA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Woodstock.

The salary gap between Atlanta and Woodstock is $13,407 (14.60%). Atlanta's median is +4.92% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Atlanta spans $41,697,Woodstock spans $48,048. Woodstock has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Atlanta
P10 (Entry)$87,206
P25$90,662
Median$105,219
P75$111,206
P90 (Top)$128,903
Woodstock
P10 (Entry)$68,092
P25$81,830
Median$91,812
P75$99,594
P90 (Top)$116,140

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Atlanta ($105,158 effective) pays 6.63% more than Woodstock ($98,617 effective).

Atlanta
Nominal: $105,219
CoL Index: 100.058
Adjusted: $105,158
Woodstock
Nominal: $91,812
CoL Index: 93.1
Adjusted: $98,617

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Atlanta if…

  • Higher median salary ($105,219/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($128,903)
  • Larger job market (1,010 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $105,158)
  • You prefer the Georgia area and lifestyle

Choose Woodstock if…

  • You prefer the Georgia area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Atlanta grew 36.4% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 24.7% growth in Woodstock over the same period.

Atlanta, GA

+36.4%

$73,450 (2019) → $100,180 (2025)

Woodstock, GA

+24.7%

$70,102 (2024) → $87,415 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Atlanta or Woodstock?

Atlanta has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $105,219/year, compared to Woodstock at $91,812/year — a difference of $13,407 (14.60%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Atlanta and Woodstock?

Atlanta magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $50.58/hr while Woodstock hygienists earn $44.14/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Atlanta to Woodstock as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Atlanta and Woodstock. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Atlanta = $105,158, Woodstock = $98,617), job availability (1,010 vs 5 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Atlanta vs Woodstock?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $87,206 in Atlanta and $68,092 in Woodstock. The Atlanta area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov