MRI Technologist Pay

Austin vs Cedar Hill: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Austin, TX and Cedar Hill, TX. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Austin, TX
$98,193
$47.21/hr
Cedar Hill, TX
$93,627
$45.02/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAustin, TXCedar Hill, TX
Median Salary$98,193$93,627
Hourly Rate$47.21$45.02
Entry Level (P10)$82,543$69,104
25th Percentile$89,622$79,578
75th Percentile$112,477$103,200
Top Earner (P90)$125,322$121,589
Total Employed2608
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Austin ($98,193) and Cedar Hill ($93,627) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.AustinCedar HillMedian Salary$98,193$93,627Entry Level (P10)$82,543$69,104Top Earner (P90)$125,322$121,589US Median $100,283

Verdict

Austin, TX offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Cedar Hill.

The salary gap between Austin and Cedar Hill is $4,566 (4.88%). Austin's median is -2.08% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Austin spans $42,779,Cedar Hill spans $52,485. Cedar Hill has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Austin
P10 (Entry)$82,543
P25$89,622
Median$98,193
P75$112,477
P90 (Top)$125,322
Cedar Hill
P10 (Entry)$69,104
P25$79,578
Median$93,627
P75$103,200
P90 (Top)$121,589

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Austin ($100,130 effective) pays 2.67% more than Cedar Hill ($97,528 effective).

Austin
Nominal: $98,193
CoL Index: 98.066
Adjusted: $100,130
Cedar Hill
Nominal: $93,627
CoL Index: 96
Adjusted: $97,528

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Austin if…

  • Higher median salary ($98,193/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($125,322)
  • Larger job market (260 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $100,130)
  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Choose Cedar Hill if…

  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Austin grew 23.8% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 14.5% growth in Cedar Hill over the same period.

Austin, TX

+23.8%

$75,540 (2019) → $93,490 (2025)

Cedar Hill, TX

+14.5%

$77,828 (2024) → $89,143 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Austin or Cedar Hill?

Austin has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $98,193/year, compared to Cedar Hill at $93,627/year — a difference of $4,566 (4.88%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Austin and Cedar Hill?

Austin magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $47.21/hr while Cedar Hill hygienists earn $45.02/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Austin to Cedar Hill as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Austin and Cedar Hill. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Austin = $100,130, Cedar Hill = $97,528), job availability (260 vs 8 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Austin vs Cedar Hill?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $82,543 in Austin and $69,104 in Cedar Hill. The Austin area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov