MRI Technologist Pay

Austin vs Fort Worth: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Austin, TX and Fort Worth, TX. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Austin, TX
$98,193
$47.21/hr
Fort Worth, TX
$106,944
$51.41/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAustin, TXFort Worth, TX
Median Salary$98,193$106,944
Hourly Rate$47.21$51.41
Entry Level (P10)$82,543$76,870
25th Percentile$89,622$90,400
75th Percentile$112,477$123,432
Top Earner (P90)$125,322$151,684
Total Employed260219
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Austin ($98,193) and Fort Worth ($106,944) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.AustinFort WorthMedian Salary$98,193$106,944Entry Level (P10)$82,543$76,870Top Earner (P90)$125,322$151,684US Median $100,283

Verdict

Fort Worth, TX offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Austin.

The salary gap between Austin and Fort Worth is $8,751 (8.91%). Fort Worth's median is +6.64% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Austin spans $42,779,Fort Worth spans $74,814. Fort Worth has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Austin
P10 (Entry)$82,543
P25$89,622
Median$98,193
P75$112,477
P90 (Top)$125,322
Fort Worth
P10 (Entry)$76,870
P25$90,400
Median$106,944
P75$123,432
P90 (Top)$151,684

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Fort Worth ($111,400 effective) pays 11.26% more than Austin ($100,130 effective).

Austin
Nominal: $98,193
CoL Index: 98.066
Adjusted: $100,130
Fort Worth
Nominal: $106,944
CoL Index: 96
Adjusted: $111,400

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Austin if…

  • Larger job market (260 employed)
  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Choose Fort Worth if…

  • Higher median salary ($106,944/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($151,684)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $111,400)
  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Austin grew 23.8% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 20.6% growth in Fort Worth over the same period.

Austin, TX

+23.8%

$75,540 (2019) → $93,490 (2025)

Fort Worth, TX

+20.6%

$84,463 (2024) → $101,822 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Austin or Fort Worth?

Fort Worth has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $106,944/year, compared to Austin at $98,193/year — a difference of $8,751 (8.91%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Austin and Fort Worth?

Austin magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $47.21/hr while Fort Worth hygienists earn $51.41/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Austin to Fort Worth as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Austin and Fort Worth. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Austin = $100,130, Fort Worth = $111,400), job availability (260 vs 219 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Austin vs Fort Worth?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $82,543 in Austin and $76,870 in Fort Worth. The Austin area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov