MRI Technologist Pay

Austin vs Pasadena: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Austin, TX and Pasadena, TX. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Austin, TX
$98,193
$47.21/hr
Pasadena, TX
$106,320
$51.12/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAustin, TXPasadena, TX
Median Salary$98,193$106,320
Hourly Rate$47.21$51.12
Entry Level (P10)$82,543$77,575
25th Percentile$89,622$90,357
75th Percentile$112,477$120,266
Top Earner (P90)$125,322$144,790
Total Employed26032
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Austin ($98,193) and Pasadena ($106,320) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.AustinPasadenaMedian Salary$98,193$106,320Entry Level (P10)$82,543$77,575Top Earner (P90)$125,322$144,790US Median $100,283

Verdict

Pasadena, TX offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Austin.

The salary gap between Austin and Pasadena is $8,127 (8.28%). Pasadena's median is +6.02% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Austin spans $42,779,Pasadena spans $67,215. Pasadena has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Austin
P10 (Entry)$82,543
P25$89,622
Median$98,193
P75$112,477
P90 (Top)$125,322
Pasadena
P10 (Entry)$77,575
P25$90,357
Median$106,320
P75$120,266
P90 (Top)$144,790

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Pasadena ($110,750 effective) pays 10.61% more than Austin ($100,130 effective).

Austin
Nominal: $98,193
CoL Index: 98.066
Adjusted: $100,130
Pasadena
Nominal: $106,320
CoL Index: 96
Adjusted: $110,750

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Austin if…

  • Larger job market (260 employed)
  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Choose Pasadena if…

  • Higher median salary ($106,320/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($144,790)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $110,750)
  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Austin grew 23.8% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 29.0% growth in Pasadena over the same period.

Austin, TX

+23.8%

$75,540 (2019) → $93,490 (2025)

Pasadena, TX

+29.0%

$78,467 (2024) → $101,228 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Austin or Pasadena?

Pasadena has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $106,320/year, compared to Austin at $98,193/year — a difference of $8,127 (8.28%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Austin and Pasadena?

Austin magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $47.21/hr while Pasadena hygienists earn $51.12/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Austin to Pasadena as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Austin and Pasadena. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Austin = $100,130, Pasadena = $110,750), job availability (260 vs 32 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Austin vs Pasadena?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $82,543 in Austin and $77,575 in Pasadena. The Austin area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov