MRI Technologist Pay

Austin vs San Antonio: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Austin, TX and San Antonio, TX. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Austin, TX
$98,193
$47.21/hr
San Antonio, TX
$99,096
$47.64/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAustin, TXSan Antonio, TX
Median Salary$98,193$99,096
Hourly Rate$47.21$47.64
Entry Level (P10)$82,543$80,789
25th Percentile$89,622$85,620
75th Percentile$112,477$103,875
Top Earner (P90)$125,322$109,147
Total Employed260190
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Austin ($98,193) and San Antonio ($99,096) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.AustinSan AntonioMedian Salary$98,193$99,096Entry Level (P10)$82,543$80,789Top Earner (P90)$125,322$109,147US Median $100,283

Verdict

Austin and San Antonio are closely matched on overall magnetic resonance imaging technologist compensation, each winning on different metrics.

The salary gap between Austin and San Antonio is $903 (0.92%). San Antonio's median is -1.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Austin spans $42,779,San Antonio spans $28,358. Austin has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Austin
P10 (Entry)$82,543
P25$89,622
Median$98,193
P75$112,477
P90 (Top)$125,322
San Antonio
P10 (Entry)$80,789
P25$85,620
Median$99,096
P75$103,875
P90 (Top)$109,147

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Antonio ($104,624 effective) pays 4.49% more than Austin ($100,130 effective).

Austin
Nominal: $98,193
CoL Index: 98.066
Adjusted: $100,130
San Antonio
Nominal: $99,096
CoL Index: 94.716
Adjusted: $104,624

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Austin if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($125,322)
  • Larger job market (260 employed)
  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Choose San Antonio if…

  • Higher median salary ($99,096/year)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $104,624)
  • You prefer the Texas area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Austin grew 23.8% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 31.4% growth in San Antonio over the same period.

Austin, TX

+23.8%

$75,540 (2019) → $93,490 (2025)

San Antonio, TX

+31.4%

$71,820 (2019) → $94,350 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Austin or San Antonio?

San Antonio has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $99,096/year, compared to Austin at $98,193/year — a difference of $903 (0.92%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Austin and San Antonio?

Austin magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $47.21/hr while San Antonio hygienists earn $47.64/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Austin to San Antonio as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Austin and San Antonio. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Austin = $100,130, San Antonio = $104,624), job availability (260 vs 190 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Austin vs San Antonio?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $82,543 in Austin and $80,789 in San Antonio. The Austin area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov