MRI Technologist Pay

Bridgeport vs Groton: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Bridgeport, CT and Groton, CT. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Bridgeport, CT
$128,063
$61.57/hr
Groton, CT
$104,887
$50.42/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBridgeport, CTGroton, CT
Median Salary$128,063$104,887
Hourly Rate$61.57$50.42
Entry Level (P10)$88,572$73,859
25th Percentile$110,891$92,993
75th Percentile$137,600$117,159
Top Earner (P90)$141,833$138,361
Total Employed806
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Bridgeport ($128,063) and Groton ($104,887) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.BridgeportGrotonMedian Salary$128,063$104,887Entry Level (P10)$88,572$73,859Top Earner (P90)$141,833$138,361US Median $100,283

Verdict

Bridgeport, CT offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Groton.

The salary gap between Bridgeport and Groton is $23,176 (22.10%). Bridgeport's median is +27.70% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Bridgeport spans $53,261,Groton spans $64,502. Groton has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Bridgeport
P10 (Entry)$88,572
P25$110,891
Median$128,063
P75$137,600
P90 (Top)$141,833
Groton
P10 (Entry)$73,859
P25$92,993
Median$104,887
P75$117,159
P90 (Top)$138,361

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Bridgeport ($119,837 effective) pays 23.28% more than Groton ($97,208 effective).

Bridgeport
Nominal: $128,063
CoL Index: 106.864
Adjusted: $119,837
Groton
Nominal: $104,887
CoL Index: 107.9
Adjusted: $97,208

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Bridgeport if…

  • Higher median salary ($128,063/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($141,833)
  • Larger job market (80 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $119,837)
  • You prefer the Connecticut area and lifestyle

Choose Groton if…

  • You prefer the Connecticut area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Bridgeport grew 37.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 1.6% growth in Groton over the same period.

Bridgeport, CT

+37.6%

$88,580 (2019) → $121,930 (2025)

Groton, CT

+1.6%

$98,316 (2024) → $99,864 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Bridgeport or Groton?

Bridgeport has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $128,063/year, compared to Groton at $104,887/year — a difference of $23,176 (22.10%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Bridgeport and Groton?

Bridgeport magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $61.57/hr while Groton hygienists earn $50.42/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Bridgeport to Groton as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Bridgeport and Groton. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Bridgeport = $119,837, Groton = $97,208), job availability (80 vs 6 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Bridgeport vs Groton?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $88,572 in Bridgeport and $73,859 in Groton. The Bridgeport area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov