MRI Technologist Pay

Bridgeport vs Norwalk: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Bridgeport, CT and Norwalk, CT. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Bridgeport, CT
$128,063
$61.57/hr
Norwalk, CT
$107,684
$51.77/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBridgeport, CTNorwalk, CT
Median Salary$128,063$107,684
Hourly Rate$61.57$51.77
Entry Level (P10)$88,572$74,573
25th Percentile$110,891$88,333
75th Percentile$137,600$122,894
Top Earner (P90)$141,833$147,718
Total Employed8021
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Bridgeport ($128,063) and Norwalk ($107,684) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.BridgeportNorwalkMedian Salary$128,063$107,684Entry Level (P10)$88,572$74,573Top Earner (P90)$141,833$147,718US Median $100,283

Verdict

Bridgeport, CT offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Norwalk.

The salary gap between Bridgeport and Norwalk is $20,379 (18.92%). Bridgeport's median is +27.70% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Bridgeport spans $53,261,Norwalk spans $73,145. Norwalk has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Bridgeport
P10 (Entry)$88,572
P25$110,891
Median$128,063
P75$137,600
P90 (Top)$141,833
Norwalk
P10 (Entry)$74,573
P25$88,333
Median$107,684
P75$122,894
P90 (Top)$147,718

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Bridgeport ($119,837 effective) pays 20.08% more than Norwalk ($99,800 effective).

Bridgeport
Nominal: $128,063
CoL Index: 106.864
Adjusted: $119,837
Norwalk
Nominal: $107,684
CoL Index: 107.9
Adjusted: $99,800

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Bridgeport if…

  • Higher median salary ($128,063/year)
  • Larger job market (80 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $119,837)
  • You prefer the Connecticut area and lifestyle

Choose Norwalk if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($147,718)
  • You prefer the Connecticut area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Bridgeport grew 37.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 1.6% growth in Norwalk over the same period.

Bridgeport, CT

+37.6%

$88,580 (2019) → $121,930 (2025)

Norwalk, CT

+1.6%

$100,938 (2024) → $102,527 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Bridgeport or Norwalk?

Bridgeport has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $128,063/year, compared to Norwalk at $107,684/year — a difference of $20,379 (18.92%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Bridgeport and Norwalk?

Bridgeport magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $61.57/hr while Norwalk hygienists earn $51.77/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Bridgeport to Norwalk as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Bridgeport and Norwalk. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Bridgeport = $119,837, Norwalk = $99,800), job availability (80 vs 21 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Bridgeport vs Norwalk?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $88,572 in Bridgeport and $74,573 in Norwalk. The Bridgeport area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov