MRI Technologist Pay

Burlington vs Cedar Rapids: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Burlington, IA and Cedar Rapids, IA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Burlington, IA
$87,047
$41.85/hr
Cedar Rapids, IA
$90,145
$43.34/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBurlington, IACedar Rapids, IA
Median Salary$87,047$90,145
Hourly Rate$41.85$43.34
Entry Level (P10)$66,251$62,855
25th Percentile$75,398$74,400
75th Percentile$94,678$101,568
Top Earner (P90)$109,914$122,557
Total Employed422
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Burlington ($87,047) and Cedar Rapids ($90,145) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.BurlingtonCedar RapidsMedian Salary$87,047$90,145Entry Level (P10)$66,251$62,855Top Earner (P90)$109,914$122,557US Median $100,283

Verdict

Cedar Rapids, IA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Burlington.

The salary gap between Burlington and Cedar Rapids is $3,098 (3.56%). Cedar Rapids's median is -10.11% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Burlington spans $43,663,Cedar Rapids spans $59,702. Cedar Rapids has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Burlington
P10 (Entry)$66,251
P25$75,398
Median$87,047
P75$94,678
P90 (Top)$109,914
Cedar Rapids
P10 (Entry)$62,855
P25$74,400
Median$90,145
P75$101,568
P90 (Top)$122,557

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Cedar Rapids ($99,718 effective) pays 3.56% more than Burlington ($96,291 effective).

Burlington
Nominal: $87,047
CoL Index: 90.4
Adjusted: $96,291
Cedar Rapids
Nominal: $90,145
CoL Index: 90.4
Adjusted: $99,718

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Burlington if…

  • You prefer the Iowa area and lifestyle

Choose Cedar Rapids if…

  • Higher median salary ($90,145/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($122,557)
  • Larger job market (22 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $99,718)
  • You prefer the Iowa area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Burlington grew 29.0% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 29.0% growth in Cedar Rapids over the same period.

Burlington, IA

+29.0%

$64,233 (2024) → $82,878 (2025)

Cedar Rapids, IA

+29.0%

$66,519 (2024) → $85,828 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Burlington or Cedar Rapids?

Cedar Rapids has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $90,145/year, compared to Burlington at $87,047/year — a difference of $3,098 (3.56%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Burlington and Cedar Rapids?

Burlington magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $41.85/hr while Cedar Rapids hygienists earn $43.34/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Burlington to Cedar Rapids as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Burlington and Cedar Rapids. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Burlington = $96,291, Cedar Rapids = $99,718), job availability (4 vs 22 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Burlington vs Cedar Rapids?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $66,251 in Burlington and $62,855 in Cedar Rapids. The Burlington area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov