MRI Technologist Pay

Cedar Falls vs Des Moines: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Cedar Falls, IA and Des Moines, IA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Cedar Falls, IA
$89,811
$43.18/hr
Des Moines, IA
$89,349
$42.96/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCedar Falls, IADes Moines, IA
Median Salary$89,811$89,349
Hourly Rate$43.18$42.96
Entry Level (P10)$63,799$76,556
25th Percentile$80,038$84,843
75th Percentile$97,347$99,905
Top Earner (P90)$113,595$103,749
Total Employed860
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Cedar Falls ($89,811) and Des Moines ($89,349) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Cedar FallsDes MoinesMedian Salary$89,811$89,349Entry Level (P10)$63,799$76,556Top Earner (P90)$113,595$103,749US Median $100,283

Verdict

Cedar Falls, IA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Des Moines.

The salary gap between Cedar Falls and Des Moines is $462 (0.52%). Cedar Falls's median is -10.44% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Cedar Falls spans $49,796,Des Moines spans $27,193. Cedar Falls has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Cedar Falls
P10 (Entry)$63,799
P25$80,038
Median$89,811
P75$97,347
P90 (Top)$113,595
Des Moines
P10 (Entry)$76,556
P25$84,843
Median$89,349
P75$99,905
P90 (Top)$103,749

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Cedar Falls ($99,348 effective) pays 1.96% more than Des Moines ($97,435 effective).

Cedar Falls
Nominal: $89,811
CoL Index: 90.4
Adjusted: $99,348
Des Moines
Nominal: $89,349
CoL Index: 91.701
Adjusted: $97,435

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Cedar Falls if…

  • Higher median salary ($89,811/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($113,595)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $99,348)
  • You prefer the Iowa area and lifestyle

Choose Des Moines if…

  • Larger job market (60 employed)
  • You prefer the Iowa area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Cedar Falls grew 29.0% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 39.7% growth in Des Moines over the same period.

Cedar Falls, IA

+29.0%

$66,273 (2024) → $85,510 (2025)

Des Moines, IA

+39.7%

$60,900 (2019) → $85,070 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Cedar Falls or Des Moines?

Cedar Falls has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $89,811/year, compared to Des Moines at $89,349/year — a difference of $462 (0.52%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Cedar Falls and Des Moines?

Cedar Falls magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $43.18/hr while Des Moines hygienists earn $42.96/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Cedar Falls to Des Moines as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Cedar Falls and Des Moines. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Cedar Falls = $99,348, Des Moines = $97,435), job availability (8 vs 60 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Cedar Falls vs Des Moines?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $63,799 in Cedar Falls and $76,556 in Des Moines. The Des Moines area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov