MRI Technologist Pay

Cedar Rapids vs Johnston: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Cedar Rapids, IA and Johnston, IA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Cedar Rapids, IA
$90,145
$43.34/hr
Johnston, IA
$84,143
$40.46/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCedar Rapids, IAJohnston, IA
Median Salary$90,145$84,143
Hourly Rate$43.34$40.46
Entry Level (P10)$62,855$66,688
25th Percentile$74,400$74,540
75th Percentile$101,568$93,204
Top Earner (P90)$122,557$108,563
Total Employed224
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Cedar Rapids ($90,145) and Johnston ($84,143) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Cedar RapidsJohnstonMedian Salary$90,145$84,143Entry Level (P10)$62,855$66,688Top Earner (P90)$122,557$108,563US Median $100,283

Verdict

Cedar Rapids, IA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Johnston.

The salary gap between Cedar Rapids and Johnston is $6,002 (7.13%). Cedar Rapids's median is -10.11% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Cedar Rapids spans $59,702,Johnston spans $41,875. Cedar Rapids has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Cedar Rapids
P10 (Entry)$62,855
P25$74,400
Median$90,145
P75$101,568
P90 (Top)$122,557
Johnston
P10 (Entry)$66,688
P25$74,540
Median$84,143
P75$93,204
P90 (Top)$108,563

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Cedar Rapids ($99,718 effective) pays 7.13% more than Johnston ($93,079 effective).

Cedar Rapids
Nominal: $90,145
CoL Index: 90.4
Adjusted: $99,718
Johnston
Nominal: $84,143
CoL Index: 90.4
Adjusted: $93,079

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Cedar Rapids if…

  • Higher median salary ($90,145/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($122,557)
  • Larger job market (22 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $99,718)
  • You prefer the Iowa area and lifestyle

Choose Johnston if…

  • You prefer the Iowa area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Cedar Rapids grew 29.0% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 29.0% growth in Johnston over the same period.

Cedar Rapids, IA

+29.0%

$66,519 (2024) → $85,828 (2025)

Johnston, IA

+29.0%

$62,090 (2024) → $80,113 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Cedar Rapids or Johnston?

Cedar Rapids has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $90,145/year, compared to Johnston at $84,143/year — a difference of $6,002 (7.13%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Cedar Rapids and Johnston?

Cedar Rapids magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $43.34/hr while Johnston hygienists earn $40.46/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Cedar Rapids to Johnston as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Cedar Rapids and Johnston. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Cedar Rapids = $99,718, Johnston = $93,079), job availability (22 vs 4 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Cedar Rapids vs Johnston?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $62,855 in Cedar Rapids and $66,688 in Johnston. The Johnston area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov