MRI Technologist Pay

Charleston vs Columbia: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Charleston, SC and Columbia, SC. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Charleston, SC
$89,559
$43.06/hr
Columbia, SC
$89,864
$43.21/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCharleston, SCColumbia, SC
Median Salary$89,559$89,864
Hourly Rate$43.06$43.21
Entry Level (P10)$69,299$71,725
25th Percentile$81,083$82,669
75th Percentile$98,592$96,964
Top Earner (P90)$98,592$100,094
Total Employed170130
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Charleston ($89,559) and Columbia ($89,864) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.CharlestonColumbiaMedian Salary$89,559$89,864Entry Level (P10)$69,299$71,725Top Earner (P90)$98,592$100,094US Median $100,283

Verdict

Columbia, SC offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Charleston.

The salary gap between Charleston and Columbia is $305 (0.34%). Columbia's median is -10.39% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Charleston spans $29,293,Columbia spans $28,369. Charleston has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Charleston
P10 (Entry)$69,299
P25$81,083
Median$89,559
P75$98,592
P90 (Top)$98,592
Columbia
P10 (Entry)$71,725
P25$82,669
Median$89,864
P75$96,964
P90 (Top)$100,094

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Columbia ($95,945 effective) pays 8.16% more than Charleston ($88,706 effective).

Charleston
Nominal: $89,559
CoL Index: 100.962
Adjusted: $88,706
Columbia
Nominal: $89,864
CoL Index: 93.662
Adjusted: $95,945

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Charleston if…

  • Larger job market (170 employed)
  • You prefer the South Carolina area and lifestyle

Choose Columbia if…

  • Higher median salary ($89,864/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($100,094)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $95,945)
  • You prefer the South Carolina area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Charleston grew 28.0% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 24.5% growth in Columbia over the same period.

Charleston, SC

+28.0%

$66,610 (2019) → $85,270 (2025)

Columbia, SC

+24.5%

$68,730 (2019) → $85,560 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Charleston or Columbia?

Columbia has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $89,864/year, compared to Charleston at $89,559/year — a difference of $305 (0.34%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Charleston and Columbia?

Charleston magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $43.06/hr while Columbia hygienists earn $43.21/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Charleston to Columbia as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Charleston and Columbia. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Charleston = $88,706, Columbia = $95,945), job availability (170 vs 130 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Charleston vs Columbia?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $69,299 in Charleston and $71,725 in Columbia. The Columbia area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov