MRI Technologist Pay

Charleston vs Fairmont: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Charleston, WV and Fairmont, WV. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Charleston, WV
$85,410
$41.07/hr
Fairmont, WV
$80,721
$38.81/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCharleston, WVFairmont, WV
Median Salary$85,410$80,721
Hourly Rate$41.07$38.81
Entry Level (P10)$62,094$64,328
25th Percentile$72,161$71,765
75th Percentile$93,724$87,821
Top Earner (P90)$110,229$101,963
Total Employed104
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Charleston ($85,410) and Fairmont ($80,721) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.CharlestonFairmontMedian Salary$85,410$80,721Entry Level (P10)$62,094$64,328Top Earner (P90)$110,229$101,963US Median $100,283

Verdict

Charleston, WV offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Fairmont.

The salary gap between Charleston and Fairmont is $4,689 (5.81%). Charleston's median is -14.83% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Charleston spans $48,135,Fairmont spans $37,635. Charleston has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Charleston
P10 (Entry)$62,094
P25$72,161
Median$85,410
P75$93,724
P90 (Top)$110,229
Fairmont
P10 (Entry)$64,328
P25$71,765
Median$80,721
P75$87,821
P90 (Top)$101,963

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Charleston ($98,740 effective) pays 5.81% more than Fairmont ($93,319 effective).

Charleston
Nominal: $85,410
CoL Index: 86.5
Adjusted: $98,740
Fairmont
Nominal: $80,721
CoL Index: 86.5
Adjusted: $93,319

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Charleston if…

  • Higher median salary ($85,410/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($110,229)
  • Larger job market (10 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $98,740)
  • You prefer the West Virginia area and lifestyle

Choose Fairmont if…

  • You prefer the West Virginia area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Charleston grew 49.2% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 49.2% growth in Fairmont over the same period.

Charleston, WV

+49.2%

$54,509 (2024) → $81,320 (2025)

Fairmont, WV

+49.2%

$51,516 (2024) → $76,855 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Charleston or Fairmont?

Charleston has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $85,410/year, compared to Fairmont at $80,721/year — a difference of $4,689 (5.81%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Charleston and Fairmont?

Charleston magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $41.07/hr while Fairmont hygienists earn $38.81/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Charleston to Fairmont as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Charleston and Fairmont. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Charleston = $98,740, Fairmont = $93,319), job availability (10 vs 4 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Charleston vs Fairmont?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $62,094 in Charleston and $64,328 in Fairmont. The Fairmont area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov