MRI Technologist Pay

Chesapeake vs Sterling: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Chesapeake, VA and Sterling, VA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Chesapeake, VA
$101,167
$48.64/hr
Sterling, VA
$99,299
$47.74/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricChesapeake, VASterling, VA
Median Salary$101,167$99,299
Hourly Rate$48.64$47.74
Entry Level (P10)$66,613$76,134
25th Percentile$86,750$84,602
75th Percentile$118,218$109,649
Top Earner (P90)$145,429$129,278
Total Employed637
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Chesapeake ($101,167) and Sterling ($99,299) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.ChesapeakeSterlingMedian Salary$101,167$99,299Entry Level (P10)$66,613$76,134Top Earner (P90)$145,429$129,278US Median $100,283

Verdict

Chesapeake, VA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Sterling.

The salary gap between Chesapeake and Sterling is $1,868 (1.88%). Chesapeake's median is +0.88% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Chesapeake spans $78,816,Sterling spans $53,144. Chesapeake has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Chesapeake
P10 (Entry)$66,613
P25$86,750
Median$101,167
P75$118,218
P90 (Top)$145,429
Sterling
P10 (Entry)$76,134
P25$84,602
Median$99,299
P75$109,649
P90 (Top)$129,278

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Chesapeake ($98,030 effective) pays 1.88% more than Sterling ($96,220 effective).

Chesapeake
Nominal: $101,167
CoL Index: 103.2
Adjusted: $98,030
Sterling
Nominal: $99,299
CoL Index: 103.2
Adjusted: $96,220

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Chesapeake if…

  • Higher median salary ($101,167/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($145,429)
  • Larger job market (63 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $98,030)
  • You prefer the Virginia area and lifestyle

Choose Sterling if…

  • You prefer the Virginia area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Chesapeake grew 12.8% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 19.3% growth in Sterling over the same period.

Chesapeake, VA

+12.8%

$85,367 (2024) → $96,322 (2025)

Sterling, VA

+19.3%

$79,215 (2024) → $94,543 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Chesapeake or Sterling?

Chesapeake has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $101,167/year, compared to Sterling at $99,299/year — a difference of $1,868 (1.88%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Chesapeake and Sterling?

Chesapeake magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $48.64/hr while Sterling hygienists earn $47.74/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Chesapeake to Sterling as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Chesapeake and Sterling. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Chesapeake = $98,030, Sterling = $96,220), job availability (63 vs 7 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Chesapeake vs Sterling?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $66,613 in Chesapeake and $76,134 in Sterling. The Sterling area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov