MRI Technologist Pay

Chesapeake vs Tuckahoe: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Chesapeake, VA and Tuckahoe, VA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Chesapeake, VA
$101,167
$48.64/hr
Tuckahoe, VA
$101,466
$48.79/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricChesapeake, VATuckahoe, VA
Median Salary$101,167$101,466
Hourly Rate$48.64$48.79
Entry Level (P10)$66,613$73,472
25th Percentile$86,750$85,193
75th Percentile$118,218$110,825
Top Earner (P90)$145,429$130,101
Total Employed6310
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Chesapeake ($101,167) and Tuckahoe ($101,466) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.ChesapeakeTuckahoeMedian Salary$101,167$101,466Entry Level (P10)$66,613$73,472Top Earner (P90)$145,429$130,101US Median $100,283

Verdict

Chesapeake and Tuckahoe are closely matched on overall magnetic resonance imaging technologist compensation, each winning on different metrics.

The salary gap between Chesapeake and Tuckahoe is $299 (0.30%). Tuckahoe's median is +1.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Chesapeake spans $78,816,Tuckahoe spans $56,629. Chesapeake has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Chesapeake
P10 (Entry)$66,613
P25$86,750
Median$101,167
P75$118,218
P90 (Top)$145,429
Tuckahoe
P10 (Entry)$73,472
P25$85,193
Median$101,466
P75$110,825
P90 (Top)$130,101

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Tuckahoe ($98,320 effective) pays 0.30% more than Chesapeake ($98,030 effective).

Chesapeake
Nominal: $101,167
CoL Index: 103.2
Adjusted: $98,030
Tuckahoe
Nominal: $101,466
CoL Index: 103.2
Adjusted: $98,320

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Chesapeake if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($145,429)
  • Larger job market (63 employed)
  • You prefer the Virginia area and lifestyle

Choose Tuckahoe if…

  • Higher median salary ($101,466/year)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $98,320)
  • You prefer the Virginia area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Chesapeake grew 12.8% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 19.3% growth in Tuckahoe over the same period.

Chesapeake, VA

+12.8%

$85,367 (2024) → $96,322 (2025)

Tuckahoe, VA

+19.3%

$80,945 (2024) → $96,607 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Chesapeake or Tuckahoe?

Tuckahoe has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $101,466/year, compared to Chesapeake at $101,167/year — a difference of $299 (0.30%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Chesapeake and Tuckahoe?

Chesapeake magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $48.64/hr while Tuckahoe hygienists earn $48.79/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Chesapeake to Tuckahoe as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Chesapeake and Tuckahoe. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Chesapeake = $98,030, Tuckahoe = $98,320), job availability (63 vs 10 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Chesapeake vs Tuckahoe?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $66,613 in Chesapeake and $73,472 in Tuckahoe. The Tuckahoe area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov