MRI Technologist Pay

Cheshire vs New Haven: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Cheshire, CT and New Haven, CT. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Cheshire, CT
$103,309
$49.67/hr
New Haven, CT
$114,241
$54.92/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCheshire, CTNew Haven, CT
Median Salary$103,309$114,241
Hourly Rate$49.67$54.92
Entry Level (P10)$78,813$85,106
25th Percentile$89,700$95,703
75th Percentile$113,481$124,366
Top Earner (P90)$133,520$138,451
Total Employed4110
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Cheshire ($103,309) and New Haven ($114,241) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.CheshireNew HavenMedian Salary$103,309$114,241Entry Level (P10)$78,813$85,106Top Earner (P90)$133,520$138,451US Median $100,283

Verdict

New Haven, CT offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Cheshire.

The salary gap between Cheshire and New Haven is $10,932 (10.58%). New Haven's median is +13.92% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Cheshire spans $54,707,New Haven spans $53,345. Cheshire has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Cheshire
P10 (Entry)$78,813
P25$89,700
Median$103,309
P75$113,481
P90 (Top)$133,520
New Haven
P10 (Entry)$85,106
P25$95,703
Median$114,241
P75$124,366
P90 (Top)$138,451

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, New Haven ($109,260 effective) pays 14.12% more than Cheshire ($95,745 effective).

Cheshire
Nominal: $103,309
CoL Index: 107.9
Adjusted: $95,745
New Haven
Nominal: $114,241
CoL Index: 104.559
Adjusted: $109,260

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Cheshire if…

  • You prefer the Connecticut area and lifestyle

Choose New Haven if…

  • Higher median salary ($114,241/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($138,451)
  • Larger job market (110 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $109,260)
  • You prefer the Connecticut area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Cheshire grew 1.6% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 51.7% growth in New Haven over the same period.

Cheshire, CT

+1.6%

$96,837 (2024) → $98,361 (2025)

New Haven, CT

+51.7%

$71,720 (2019) → $108,770 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Cheshire or New Haven?

New Haven has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $114,241/year, compared to Cheshire at $103,309/year — a difference of $10,932 (10.58%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Cheshire and New Haven?

Cheshire magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $49.67/hr while New Haven hygienists earn $54.92/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Cheshire to New Haven as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Cheshire and New Haven. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Cheshire = $95,745, New Haven = $109,260), job availability (4 vs 110 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Cheshire vs New Haven?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $78,813 in Cheshire and $85,106 in New Haven. The New Haven area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov