MRI Technologist Pay

Chicago vs Mount Prospect: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Chicago, IL and Mount Prospect, IL. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Chicago, IL
$105,797
$50.87/hr
Mount Prospect, IL
$89,298
$42.94/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricChicago, ILMount Prospect, IL
Median Salary$105,797$89,298
Hourly Rate$50.87$42.94
Entry Level (P10)$84,917$62,560
25th Percentile$88,729$73,723
75th Percentile$108,990$99,047
Top Earner (P90)$115,060$117,610
Total Employed1,93013
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Chicago ($105,797) and Mount Prospect ($89,298) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.ChicagoMount ProspectMedian Salary$105,797$89,298Entry Level (P10)$84,917$62,560Top Earner (P90)$115,060$117,610US Median $100,283

Verdict

Chicago, IL offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Mount Prospect.

The salary gap between Chicago and Mount Prospect is $16,499 (18.48%). Chicago's median is +5.50% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Chicago spans $30,143,Mount Prospect spans $55,050. Mount Prospect has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Chicago
P10 (Entry)$84,917
P25$88,729
Median$105,797
P75$108,990
P90 (Top)$115,060
Mount Prospect
P10 (Entry)$62,560
P25$73,723
Median$89,298
P75$99,047
P90 (Top)$117,610

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Chicago ($102,126 effective) pays 11.05% more than Mount Prospect ($91,965 effective).

Chicago
Nominal: $105,797
CoL Index: 103.595
Adjusted: $102,126
Mount Prospect
Nominal: $89,298
CoL Index: 97.1
Adjusted: $91,965

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Chicago if…

  • Higher median salary ($105,797/year)
  • Larger job market (1,930 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $102,126)
  • You prefer the Illinois area and lifestyle

Choose Mount Prospect if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($117,610)
  • You prefer the Illinois area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Chicago grew 34.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 4.3% growth in Mount Prospect over the same period.

Chicago, IL

+34.6%

$74,810 (2019) → $100,730 (2025)

Mount Prospect, IL

+4.3%

$81,527 (2024) → $85,021 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Chicago or Mount Prospect?

Chicago has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $105,797/year, compared to Mount Prospect at $89,298/year — a difference of $16,499 (18.48%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Chicago and Mount Prospect?

Chicago magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $50.87/hr while Mount Prospect hygienists earn $42.94/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Chicago to Mount Prospect as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Chicago and Mount Prospect. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Chicago = $102,126, Mount Prospect = $91,965), job availability (1,930 vs 13 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Chicago vs Mount Prospect?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $84,917 in Chicago and $62,560 in Mount Prospect. The Chicago area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov