MRI Technologist Pay

Chicago vs Park Ridge: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Chicago, IL and Park Ridge, IL. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Chicago, IL
$105,797
$50.87/hr
Park Ridge, IL
$85,899
$41.30/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricChicago, ILPark Ridge, IL
Median Salary$105,797$85,899
Hourly Rate$50.87$41.30
Entry Level (P10)$84,917$66,518
25th Percentile$88,729$75,312
75th Percentile$108,990$91,839
Top Earner (P90)$115,060$112,179
Total Employed1,9307
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Chicago ($105,797) and Park Ridge ($85,899) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.ChicagoPark RidgeMedian Salary$105,797$85,899Entry Level (P10)$84,917$66,518Top Earner (P90)$115,060$112,179US Median $100,283

Verdict

Chicago, IL offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Park Ridge.

The salary gap between Chicago and Park Ridge is $19,898 (23.16%). Chicago's median is +5.50% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Chicago spans $30,143,Park Ridge spans $45,661. Park Ridge has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Chicago
P10 (Entry)$84,917
P25$88,729
Median$105,797
P75$108,990
P90 (Top)$115,060
Park Ridge
P10 (Entry)$66,518
P25$75,312
Median$85,899
P75$91,839
P90 (Top)$112,179

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Chicago ($102,126 effective) pays 15.44% more than Park Ridge ($88,464 effective).

Chicago
Nominal: $105,797
CoL Index: 103.595
Adjusted: $102,126
Park Ridge
Nominal: $85,899
CoL Index: 97.1
Adjusted: $88,464

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Chicago if…

  • Higher median salary ($105,797/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($115,060)
  • Larger job market (1,930 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $102,126)
  • You prefer the Illinois area and lifestyle

Choose Park Ridge if…

  • You prefer the Illinois area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Chicago grew 34.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 4.3% growth in Park Ridge over the same period.

Chicago, IL

+34.6%

$74,810 (2019) → $100,730 (2025)

Park Ridge, IL

+4.3%

$78,424 (2024) → $81,785 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Chicago or Park Ridge?

Chicago has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $105,797/year, compared to Park Ridge at $85,899/year — a difference of $19,898 (23.16%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Chicago and Park Ridge?

Chicago magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $50.87/hr while Park Ridge hygienists earn $41.30/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Chicago to Park Ridge as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Chicago and Park Ridge. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Chicago = $102,126, Park Ridge = $88,464), job availability (1,930 vs 7 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Chicago vs Park Ridge?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $84,917 in Chicago and $66,518 in Park Ridge. The Chicago area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov