MRI Technologist Pay

Denver vs Colorado Springs: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Denver, CO and Colorado Springs, CO. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Denver, CO
$111,248
$53.48/hr
Colorado Springs, CO
$106,448
$51.18/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDenver, COColorado Springs, CO
Median Salary$111,248$106,448
Hourly Rate$53.48$51.18
Entry Level (P10)$89,969$83,824
25th Percentile$102,184$95,619
75th Percentile$119,566$116,132
Top Earner (P90)$127,548$117,045
Total Employed33080
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Denver ($111,248) and Colorado Springs ($106,448) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.DenverColorado SpringsMedian Salary$111,248$106,448Entry Level (P10)$89,969$83,824Top Earner (P90)$127,548$117,045US Median $100,283

Verdict

Denver, CO offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Colorado Springs.

The salary gap between Denver and Colorado Springs is $4,800 (4.51%). Denver's median is +10.93% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Denver spans $37,579,Colorado Springs spans $33,221. Denver has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Denver
P10 (Entry)$89,969
P25$102,184
Median$111,248
P75$119,566
P90 (Top)$127,548
Colorado Springs
P10 (Entry)$83,824
P25$95,619
Median$106,448
P75$116,132
P90 (Top)$117,045

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Colorado Springs ($105,701 effective) pays 0.51% more than Denver ($105,167 effective).

Denver
Nominal: $111,248
CoL Index: 105.782
Adjusted: $105,167
Colorado Springs
Nominal: $106,448
CoL Index: 100.707
Adjusted: $105,701

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Denver if…

  • Higher median salary ($111,248/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($127,548)
  • Larger job market (330 employed)
  • You prefer the Colorado area and lifestyle

Choose Colorado Springs if…

  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $105,701)
  • You prefer the Colorado area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Denver grew 21.4% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 40.1% growth in Colorado Springs over the same period.

Denver, CO

+21.4%

$87,250 (2019) → $105,920 (2025)

Colorado Springs, CO

+40.1%

$72,350 (2019) → $101,350 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Denver or Colorado Springs?

Denver has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $111,248/year, compared to Colorado Springs at $106,448/year — a difference of $4,800 (4.51%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Denver and Colorado Springs?

Denver magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $53.48/hr while Colorado Springs hygienists earn $51.18/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Denver to Colorado Springs as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Denver and Colorado Springs. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Denver = $105,167, Colorado Springs = $105,701), job availability (330 vs 80 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Denver vs Colorado Springs?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $89,969 in Denver and $83,824 in Colorado Springs. The Denver area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov