MRI Technologist Pay

Edmond vs Tulsa: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Edmond, OK and Tulsa, OK. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Edmond, OK
$86,053
$41.37/hr
Tulsa, OK
$91,849
$44.15/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEdmond, OKTulsa, OK
Median Salary$86,053$91,849
Hourly Rate$41.37$44.15
Entry Level (P10)$59,891$74,676
25th Percentile$70,746$81,829
75th Percentile$95,019$96,302
Top Earner (P90)$113,062$105,965
Total Employed25110
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Edmond ($86,053) and Tulsa ($91,849) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.EdmondTulsaMedian Salary$86,053$91,849Entry Level (P10)$59,891$74,676Top Earner (P90)$113,062$105,965US Median $100,283

Verdict

Tulsa, OK offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Edmond.

The salary gap between Edmond and Tulsa is $5,796 (6.74%). Tulsa's median is -8.41% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Edmond spans $53,171,Tulsa spans $31,289. Edmond has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Edmond
P10 (Entry)$59,891
P25$70,746
Median$86,053
P75$95,019
P90 (Top)$113,062
Tulsa
P10 (Entry)$74,676
P25$81,829
Median$91,849
P75$96,302
P90 (Top)$105,965

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Tulsa ($102,954 effective) pays 6.36% more than Edmond ($96,798 effective).

Edmond
Nominal: $86,053
CoL Index: 88.9
Adjusted: $96,798
Tulsa
Nominal: $91,849
CoL Index: 89.214
Adjusted: $102,954

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Edmond if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($113,062)
  • You prefer the Oklahoma area and lifestyle

Choose Tulsa if…

  • Higher median salary ($91,849/year)
  • Larger job market (110 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $102,954)
  • You prefer the Oklahoma area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Edmond grew 36.4% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 33.3% growth in Tulsa over the same period.

Edmond, OK

+36.4%

$60,068 (2024) → $81,932 (2025)

Tulsa, OK

+33.3%

$65,580 (2019) → $87,450 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Edmond or Tulsa?

Tulsa has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $91,849/year, compared to Edmond at $86,053/year — a difference of $5,796 (6.74%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Edmond and Tulsa?

Edmond magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $41.37/hr while Tulsa hygienists earn $44.15/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Edmond to Tulsa as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Edmond and Tulsa. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Edmond = $96,798, Tulsa = $102,954), job availability (25 vs 110 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Edmond vs Tulsa?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $59,891 in Edmond and $74,676 in Tulsa. The Tulsa area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov