MRI Technologist Pay

Eugene vs Happy Valley: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Eugene, OR and Happy Valley, OR. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Eugene, OR
$118,022
$56.75/hr
Happy Valley, OR
$97,850
$47.04/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEugene, ORHappy Valley, OR
Median Salary$118,022$97,850
Hourly Rate$56.75$47.04
Entry Level (P10)$98,277$73,168
25th Percentile$113,243$83,573
75th Percentile$132,495$103,315
Top Earner (P90)$133,756$127,367
Total Employed504
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Eugene ($118,022) and Happy Valley ($97,850) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.EugeneHappy ValleyMedian Salary$118,022$97,850Entry Level (P10)$98,277$73,168Top Earner (P90)$133,756$127,367US Median $100,283

Verdict

Eugene, OR offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Happy Valley.

The salary gap between Eugene and Happy Valley is $20,172 (20.62%). Eugene's median is +17.69% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Eugene spans $35,479,Happy Valley spans $54,199. Happy Valley has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Eugene
P10 (Entry)$98,277
P25$113,243
Median$118,022
P75$132,495
P90 (Top)$133,756
Happy Valley
P10 (Entry)$73,168
P25$83,573
Median$97,850
P75$103,315
P90 (Top)$127,367

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Eugene ($116,200 effective) pays 21.84% more than Happy Valley ($95,370 effective).

Eugene
Nominal: $118,022
CoL Index: 101.568
Adjusted: $116,200
Happy Valley
Nominal: $97,850
CoL Index: 102.6
Adjusted: $95,370

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Eugene if…

  • Higher median salary ($118,022/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($133,756)
  • Larger job market (50 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $116,200)
  • You prefer the Oregon area and lifestyle

Choose Happy Valley if…

  • You prefer the Oregon area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Eugene grew 26.1% from 2020 to 2025, compared to -6.4% growth in Happy Valley over the same period.

Eugene, OR

+26.1%

$89,140 (2020) → $112,370 (2025)

Happy Valley, OR

+-6.4%

$99,526 (2024) → $93,164 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Eugene or Happy Valley?

Eugene has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $118,022/year, compared to Happy Valley at $97,850/year — a difference of $20,172 (20.62%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Eugene and Happy Valley?

Eugene magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $56.75/hr while Happy Valley hygienists earn $47.04/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Eugene to Happy Valley as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Eugene and Happy Valley. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Eugene = $116,200, Happy Valley = $95,370), job availability (50 vs 4 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Eugene vs Happy Valley?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $98,277 in Eugene and $73,168 in Happy Valley. The Eugene area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov