MRI Technologist Pay

Eugene vs Hillsboro: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Eugene, OR and Hillsboro, OR. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Eugene, OR
$118,022
$56.75/hr
Hillsboro, OR
$129,603
$62.31/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEugene, ORHillsboro, OR
Median Salary$118,022$129,603
Hourly Rate$56.75$62.31
Entry Level (P10)$98,277$91,555
25th Percentile$113,243$107,963
75th Percentile$132,495$144,279
Top Earner (P90)$133,756$172,754
Total Employed5022
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Eugene ($118,022) and Hillsboro ($129,603) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.EugeneHillsboroMedian Salary$118,022$129,603Entry Level (P10)$98,277$91,555Top Earner (P90)$133,756$172,754US Median $100,283

Verdict

Hillsboro, OR offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Eugene.

The salary gap between Eugene and Hillsboro is $11,581 (9.81%). Hillsboro's median is +29.24% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Eugene spans $35,479,Hillsboro spans $81,199. Hillsboro has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Eugene
P10 (Entry)$98,277
P25$113,243
Median$118,022
P75$132,495
P90 (Top)$133,756
Hillsboro
P10 (Entry)$91,555
P25$107,963
Median$129,603
P75$144,279
P90 (Top)$172,754

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Hillsboro ($126,319 effective) pays 8.71% more than Eugene ($116,200 effective).

Eugene
Nominal: $118,022
CoL Index: 101.568
Adjusted: $116,200
Hillsboro
Nominal: $129,603
CoL Index: 102.6
Adjusted: $126,319

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Eugene if…

  • Larger job market (50 employed)
  • You prefer the Oregon area and lifestyle

Choose Hillsboro if…

  • Higher median salary ($129,603/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($172,754)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $126,319)
  • You prefer the Oregon area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Eugene grew 26.1% from 2020 to 2025, compared to 14.1% growth in Hillsboro over the same period.

Eugene, OR

+26.1%

$89,140 (2020) → $112,370 (2025)

Hillsboro, OR

+14.1%

$108,104 (2024) → $123,396 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Eugene or Hillsboro?

Hillsboro has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $129,603/year, compared to Eugene at $118,022/year — a difference of $11,581 (9.81%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Eugene and Hillsboro?

Eugene magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $56.75/hr while Hillsboro hygienists earn $62.31/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Eugene to Hillsboro as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Eugene and Hillsboro. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Eugene = $116,200, Hillsboro = $126,319), job availability (50 vs 22 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Eugene vs Hillsboro?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $98,277 in Eugene and $91,555 in Hillsboro. The Eugene area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov