MRI Technologist Pay

Forest Grove vs Salem: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Forest Grove, OR and Salem, OR. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Forest Grove, OR
$100,454
$48.29/hr
Salem, OR
$128,053
$61.57/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricForest Grove, ORSalem, OR
Median Salary$100,454$128,053
Hourly Rate$48.29$61.57
Entry Level (P10)$72,036$99,505
25th Percentile$83,823$108,948
75th Percentile$109,215$136,182
Top Earner (P90)$127,976$137,736
Total Employed430
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Forest Grove ($100,454) and Salem ($128,053) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Forest GroveSalemMedian Salary$100,454$128,053Entry Level (P10)$72,036$99,505Top Earner (P90)$127,976$137,736US Median $100,283

Verdict

Salem, OR offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Forest Grove.

The salary gap between Forest Grove and Salem is $27,599 (27.47%). Salem's median is +27.69% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Forest Grove spans $55,940,Salem spans $38,231. Forest Grove has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Forest Grove
P10 (Entry)$72,036
P25$83,823
Median$100,454
P75$109,215
P90 (Top)$127,976
Salem
P10 (Entry)$99,505
P25$108,948
Median$128,053
P75$136,182
P90 (Top)$137,736

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Salem ($123,545 effective) pays 26.18% more than Forest Grove ($97,908 effective).

Forest Grove
Nominal: $100,454
CoL Index: 102.6
Adjusted: $97,908
Salem
Nominal: $128,053
CoL Index: 103.649
Adjusted: $123,545

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Forest Grove if…

  • You prefer the Oregon area and lifestyle

Choose Salem if…

  • Higher median salary ($128,053/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($137,736)
  • Larger job market (30 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $123,545)
  • You prefer the Oregon area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Forest Grove grew -6.4% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 32.1% growth in Salem over the same period.

Forest Grove, OR

+-6.4%

$102,174 (2024) → $95,643 (2025)

Salem, OR

+32.1%

$92,260 (2019) → $121,920 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Forest Grove or Salem?

Salem has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $128,053/year, compared to Forest Grove at $100,454/year — a difference of $27,599 (27.47%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Forest Grove and Salem?

Forest Grove magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $48.29/hr while Salem hygienists earn $61.57/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Forest Grove to Salem as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Forest Grove and Salem. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Forest Grove = $97,908, Salem = $123,545), job availability (4 vs 30 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Forest Grove vs Salem?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $72,036 in Forest Grove and $99,505 in Salem. The Salem area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov