MRI Technologist Pay

Fort Smith vs Little Rock: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Fort Smith, AR and Little Rock, AR. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Fort Smith, AR
$88,203
$42.40/hr
Little Rock, AR
$83,856
$40.32/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFort Smith, ARLittle Rock, AR
Median Salary$88,203$83,856
Hourly Rate$42.40$40.32
Entry Level (P10)$63,589$64,951
25th Percentile$74,165$74,277
75th Percentile$99,044$95,483
Top Earner (P90)$118,639$102,478
Total Employed15150
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Fort Smith ($88,203) and Little Rock ($83,856) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Fort SmithLittle RockMedian Salary$88,203$83,856Entry Level (P10)$63,589$64,951Top Earner (P90)$118,639$102,478US Median $100,283

Verdict

Fort Smith, AR offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Little Rock.

The salary gap between Fort Smith and Little Rock is $4,347 (5.18%). Fort Smith's median is -12.05% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Fort Smith spans $55,050,Little Rock spans $37,527. Fort Smith has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Fort Smith
P10 (Entry)$63,589
P25$74,165
Median$88,203
P75$99,044
P90 (Top)$118,639
Little Rock
P10 (Entry)$64,951
P25$74,277
Median$83,856
P75$95,483
P90 (Top)$102,478

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Fort Smith ($101,499 effective) pays 8.17% more than Little Rock ($93,836 effective).

Fort Smith
Nominal: $88,203
CoL Index: 86.9
Adjusted: $101,499
Little Rock
Nominal: $83,856
CoL Index: 89.364
Adjusted: $93,836

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Fort Smith if…

  • Higher median salary ($88,203/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($118,639)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $101,499)
  • You prefer the Arkansas area and lifestyle

Choose Little Rock if…

  • Larger job market (150 employed)
  • You prefer the Arkansas area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Fort Smith grew 44.7% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 32.0% growth in Little Rock over the same period.

Fort Smith, AR

+44.7%

$58,050 (2024) → $83,979 (2025)

Little Rock, AR

+32.0%

$60,470 (2019) → $79,840 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Fort Smith or Little Rock?

Fort Smith has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $88,203/year, compared to Little Rock at $83,856/year — a difference of $4,347 (5.18%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Fort Smith and Little Rock?

Fort Smith magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $42.40/hr while Little Rock hygienists earn $40.32/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Fort Smith to Little Rock as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Fort Smith and Little Rock. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Fort Smith = $101,499, Little Rock = $93,836), job availability (15 vs 150 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Fort Smith vs Little Rock?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $63,589 in Fort Smith and $64,951 in Little Rock. The Little Rock area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov