MRI Technologist Pay

Fort Wayne vs Portage: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Fort Wayne, IN and Portage, IN. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Fort Wayne, IN
$87,479
$42.05/hr
Portage, IN
$88,288
$42.44/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFort Wayne, INPortage, IN
Median Salary$87,479$88,288
Hourly Rate$42.05$42.44
Entry Level (P10)$67,534$66,376
25th Percentile$84,738$75,936
75th Percentile$102,562$98,318
Top Earner (P90)$103,654$115,862
Total Employed8010
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Fort Wayne ($87,479) and Portage ($88,288) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Fort WaynePortageMedian Salary$87,479$88,288Entry Level (P10)$67,534$66,376Top Earner (P90)$103,654$115,862US Median $100,283

Verdict

Portage, IN offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Fort Wayne.

The salary gap between Fort Wayne and Portage is $809 (0.92%). Portage's median is -11.96% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Fort Wayne spans $36,120,Portage spans $49,486. Portage has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Fort Wayne
P10 (Entry)$67,534
P25$84,738
Median$87,479
P75$102,562
P90 (Top)$103,654
Portage
P10 (Entry)$66,376
P25$75,936
Median$88,288
P75$98,318
P90 (Top)$115,862

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Portage ($96,701 effective) pays 2.33% more than Fort Wayne ($94,498 effective).

Fort Wayne
Nominal: $87,479
CoL Index: 92.572
Adjusted: $94,498
Portage
Nominal: $88,288
CoL Index: 91.3
Adjusted: $96,701

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Fort Wayne if…

  • Larger job market (80 employed)
  • You prefer the Indiana area and lifestyle

Choose Portage if…

  • Higher median salary ($88,288/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($115,862)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $96,701)
  • You prefer the Indiana area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Fort Wayne grew 21.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 28.8% growth in Portage over the same period.

Fort Wayne, IN

+21.6%

$68,490 (2019) → $83,290 (2025)

Portage, IN

+28.8%

$65,260 (2024) → $84,060 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Fort Wayne or Portage?

Portage has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $88,288/year, compared to Fort Wayne at $87,479/year — a difference of $809 (0.92%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Fort Wayne and Portage?

Fort Wayne magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $42.05/hr while Portage hygienists earn $42.44/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Fort Wayne to Portage as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Fort Wayne and Portage. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Fort Wayne = $94,498, Portage = $96,701), job availability (80 vs 10 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Fort Wayne vs Portage?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $67,534 in Fort Wayne and $66,376 in Portage. The Fort Wayne area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov