MRI Technologist Pay

Gloucester Township vs Newark: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Gloucester Township, NJ and Newark, NJ. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Gloucester Township, NJ
$116,013
$55.77/hr
Newark, NJ
$124,497
$59.86/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGloucester Township, NJNewark, NJ
Median Salary$116,013$124,497
Hourly Rate$55.77$59.86
Entry Level (P10)$81,678$81,519
25th Percentile$96,435$106,406
75th Percentile$126,619$144,917
Top Earner (P90)$149,956$178,674
Total Employed1061
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Gloucester Township ($116,013) and Newark ($124,497) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Gloucester TownshipNewarkMedian Salary$116,013$124,497Entry Level (P10)$81,678$81,519Top Earner (P90)$149,956$178,674US Median $100,283

Verdict

Newark, NJ offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Gloucester Township.

The salary gap between Gloucester Township and Newark is $8,484 (7.31%). Newark's median is +24.15% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Gloucester Township spans $68,278,Newark spans $97,155. Newark has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Gloucester Township
P10 (Entry)$81,678
P25$96,435
Median$116,013
P75$126,619
P90 (Top)$149,956
Newark
P10 (Entry)$81,519
P25$106,406
Median$124,497
P75$144,917
P90 (Top)$178,674

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Newark ($108,070 effective) pays 7.31% more than Gloucester Township ($100,706 effective).

Gloucester Township
Nominal: $116,013
CoL Index: 115.2
Adjusted: $100,706
Newark
Nominal: $124,497
CoL Index: 115.2
Adjusted: $108,070

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Gloucester Township if…

  • You prefer the New Jersey area and lifestyle

Choose Newark if…

  • Higher median salary ($124,497/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($178,674)
  • Larger job market (61 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $108,070)
  • You prefer the New Jersey area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Gloucester Township grew 1.6% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 4.1% growth in Newark over the same period.

Gloucester Township, NJ

+1.6%

$108,745 (2024) → $110,457 (2025)

Newark, NJ

+4.1%

$113,871 (2024) → $118,535 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Gloucester Township or Newark?

Newark has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $124,497/year, compared to Gloucester Township at $116,013/year — a difference of $8,484 (7.31%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Gloucester Township and Newark?

Gloucester Township magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $55.77/hr while Newark hygienists earn $59.86/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Gloucester Township to Newark as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Gloucester Township and Newark. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Gloucester Township = $100,706, Newark = $108,070), job availability (10 vs 61 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Gloucester Township vs Newark?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $81,678 in Gloucester Township and $81,519 in Newark. The Gloucester Township area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov