MRI Technologist Pay

Great Falls vs Missoula: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Great Falls, MT and Missoula, MT. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Great Falls, MT
$96,214
$46.26/hr
Missoula, MT
$94,342
$45.35/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGreat Falls, MTMissoula, MT
Median Salary$96,214$94,342
Hourly Rate$46.26$45.35
Entry Level (P10)$66,667$70,345
25th Percentile$79,174$81,075
75th Percentile$109,979$105,620
Top Earner (P90)$132,646$126,368
Total Employed1216
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Great Falls ($96,214) and Missoula ($94,342) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Great FallsMissoulaMedian Salary$96,214$94,342Entry Level (P10)$66,667$70,345Top Earner (P90)$132,646$126,368US Median $100,283

Verdict

Great Falls, MT offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Missoula.

The salary gap between Great Falls and Missoula is $1,872 (1.98%). Great Falls's median is -4.06% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Great Falls spans $65,979,Missoula spans $56,023. Great Falls has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Great Falls
P10 (Entry)$66,667
P25$79,174
Median$96,214
P75$109,979
P90 (Top)$132,646
Missoula
P10 (Entry)$70,345
P25$81,075
Median$94,342
P75$105,620
P90 (Top)$126,368

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Great Falls ($100,015 effective) pays 1.98% more than Missoula ($98,069 effective).

Great Falls
Nominal: $96,214
CoL Index: 96.2
Adjusted: $100,015
Missoula
Nominal: $94,342
CoL Index: 96.2
Adjusted: $98,069

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Great Falls if…

  • Higher median salary ($96,214/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($132,646)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $100,015)
  • You prefer the Montana area and lifestyle

Choose Missoula if…

  • Larger job market (16 employed)
  • You prefer the Montana area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Great Falls grew 22.4% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 21.0% growth in Missoula over the same period.

Great Falls, MT

+22.4%

$74,835 (2024) → $91,606 (2025)

Missoula, MT

+21.0%

$74,250 (2019) → $89,824 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Great Falls or Missoula?

Great Falls has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $96,214/year, compared to Missoula at $94,342/year — a difference of $1,872 (1.98%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Great Falls and Missoula?

Great Falls magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $46.26/hr while Missoula hygienists earn $45.35/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Great Falls to Missoula as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Great Falls and Missoula. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Great Falls = $100,015, Missoula = $98,069), job availability (12 vs 16 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Great Falls vs Missoula?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $66,667 in Great Falls and $70,345 in Missoula. The Missoula area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov