MRI Technologist Pay

Green Bay vs Onalaska: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Green Bay, WI and Onalaska, WI. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Green Bay, WI
$89,685
$43.11/hr
Onalaska, WI
$89,224
$42.89/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGreen Bay, WIOnalaska, WI
Median Salary$89,685$89,224
Hourly Rate$43.11$42.89
Entry Level (P10)$79,245$66,681
25th Percentile$86,629$79,898
75th Percentile$106,605$94,315
Top Earner (P90)$106,605$108,248
Total Employed504
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Green Bay ($89,685) and Onalaska ($89,224) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Green BayOnalaskaMedian Salary$89,685$89,224Entry Level (P10)$79,245$66,681Top Earner (P90)$106,605$108,248US Median $100,283

Verdict

Green Bay, WI offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Onalaska.

The salary gap between Green Bay and Onalaska is $461 (0.52%). Green Bay's median is -10.57% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Green Bay spans $27,360,Onalaska spans $41,567. Onalaska has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Green Bay
P10 (Entry)$79,245
P25$86,629
Median$89,685
P75$106,605
P90 (Top)$106,605
Onalaska
P10 (Entry)$66,681
P25$79,898
Median$89,224
P75$94,315
P90 (Top)$108,248

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Green Bay ($96,346 effective) pays 0.86% more than Onalaska ($95,529 effective).

Green Bay
Nominal: $89,685
CoL Index: 93.086
Adjusted: $96,346
Onalaska
Nominal: $89,224
CoL Index: 93.4
Adjusted: $95,529

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Green Bay if…

  • Higher median salary ($89,685/year)
  • Larger job market (50 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $96,346)
  • You prefer the Wisconsin area and lifestyle

Choose Onalaska if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($108,248)
  • You prefer the Wisconsin area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Green Bay grew 17.9% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 19.4% growth in Onalaska over the same period.

Green Bay, WI

+17.9%

$72,430 (2019) → $85,390 (2025)

Onalaska, WI

+19.4%

$71,178 (2024) → $84,951 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Green Bay or Onalaska?

Green Bay has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $89,685/year, compared to Onalaska at $89,224/year — a difference of $461 (0.52%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Green Bay and Onalaska?

Green Bay magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $43.11/hr while Onalaska hygienists earn $42.89/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Green Bay to Onalaska as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Green Bay and Onalaska. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Green Bay = $96,346, job availability (50 vs 4 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Green Bay vs Onalaska?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $79,245 in Green Bay and $66,681 in Onalaska. The Green Bay area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov