MRI Technologist Pay

Greensboro vs Raleigh: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Greensboro, NC and Raleigh, NC. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Greensboro, NC
$86,009
$41.35/hr
Raleigh, NC
$87,206
$41.93/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGreensboro, NCRaleigh, NC
Median Salary$86,009$87,206
Hourly Rate$41.35$41.93
Entry Level (P10)$65,350$52,074
25th Percentile$83,541$75,979
75th Percentile$102,961$95,934
Top Earner (P90)$106,248$102,656
Total Employed60130
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Greensboro ($86,009) and Raleigh ($87,206) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.GreensboroRaleighMedian Salary$86,009$87,206Entry Level (P10)$65,350$52,074Top Earner (P90)$106,248$102,656US Median $100,283

Verdict

Raleigh, NC offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Greensboro.

The salary gap between Greensboro and Raleigh is $1,197 (1.39%). Raleigh's median is -13.04% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Greensboro spans $40,898,Raleigh spans $50,582. Raleigh has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Greensboro
P10 (Entry)$65,350
P25$83,541
Median$86,009
P75$102,961
P90 (Top)$106,248
Raleigh
P10 (Entry)$52,074
P25$75,979
Median$87,206
P75$95,934
P90 (Top)$102,656

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Greensboro ($92,617 effective) pays 4.25% more than Raleigh ($88,843 effective).

Greensboro
Nominal: $86,009
CoL Index: 92.865
Adjusted: $92,617
Raleigh
Nominal: $87,206
CoL Index: 98.157
Adjusted: $88,843

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Greensboro if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($106,248)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $92,617)
  • You prefer the North Carolina area and lifestyle

Choose Raleigh if…

  • Higher median salary ($87,206/year)
  • Larger job market (130 employed)
  • You prefer the North Carolina area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Greensboro grew 13.4% from 2020 to 2025, compared to 22.8% growth in Raleigh over the same period.

Greensboro, NC

+13.4%

$72,190 (2020) → $81,890 (2025)

Raleigh, NC

+22.8%

$67,610 (2019) → $83,030 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Greensboro or Raleigh?

Raleigh has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $87,206/year, compared to Greensboro at $86,009/year — a difference of $1,197 (1.39%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Greensboro and Raleigh?

Greensboro magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $41.35/hr while Raleigh hygienists earn $41.93/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Greensboro to Raleigh as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Greensboro and Raleigh. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Greensboro = $92,617, Raleigh = $88,843), job availability (60 vs 130 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Greensboro vs Raleigh?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $65,350 in Greensboro and $52,074 in Raleigh. The Greensboro area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov