MRI Technologist Pay

Kansas City vs Springfield: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Kansas City, MO and Springfield, MO. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Kansas City, MO
$88,267
$42.44/hr
Springfield, MO
$81,178
$39.03/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricKansas City, MOSpringfield, MO
Median Salary$88,267$81,178
Hourly Rate$42.44$39.03
Entry Level (P10)$77,323$68,227
25th Percentile$85,263$68,227
75th Percentile$102,415$102,026
Top Earner (P90)$107,257$103,843
Total Employed39080
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Kansas City ($88,267) and Springfield ($81,178) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Kansas CitySpringfieldMedian Salary$88,267$81,178Entry Level (P10)$77,323$68,227Top Earner (P90)$107,257$103,843US Median $100,283

Verdict

Kansas City, MO offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Springfield.

The salary gap between Kansas City and Springfield is $7,089 (8.73%). Kansas City's median is -11.98% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Kansas City spans $29,934,Springfield spans $35,616. Springfield has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Kansas City
P10 (Entry)$77,323
P25$85,263
Median$88,267
P75$102,415
P90 (Top)$107,257
Springfield
P10 (Entry)$68,227
P25$68,227
Median$81,178
P75$102,026
P90 (Top)$103,843

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Kansas City ($95,379 effective) pays 4.08% more than Springfield ($91,639 effective).

Kansas City
Nominal: $88,267
CoL Index: 92.543
Adjusted: $95,379
Springfield
Nominal: $81,178
CoL Index: 88.585
Adjusted: $91,639

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Kansas City if…

  • Higher median salary ($88,267/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($107,257)
  • Larger job market (390 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $95,379)
  • You prefer the Missouri area and lifestyle

Choose Springfield if…

  • You prefer the Missouri area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Kansas City grew 18.8% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 35.8% growth in Springfield over the same period.

Kansas City, MO

+18.8%

$70,770 (2019) → $84,040 (2025)

Springfield, MO

+35.8%

$56,910 (2019) → $77,290 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Kansas City or Springfield?

Kansas City has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $88,267/year, compared to Springfield at $81,178/year — a difference of $7,089 (8.73%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Kansas City and Springfield?

Kansas City magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $42.44/hr while Springfield hygienists earn $39.03/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Kansas City to Springfield as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Kansas City and Springfield. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Kansas City = $95,379, Springfield = $91,639), job availability (390 vs 80 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Kansas City vs Springfield?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $77,323 in Kansas City and $68,227 in Springfield. The Kansas City area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov