MRI Technologist Pay

Little Rock vs Van Buren: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Little Rock, AR and Van Buren, AR. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Little Rock, AR
$83,856
$40.32/hr
Van Buren, AR
$80,891
$38.89/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLittle Rock, ARVan Buren, AR
Median Salary$83,856$80,891
Hourly Rate$40.32$38.89
Entry Level (P10)$64,951$64,122
25th Percentile$74,277$71,667
75th Percentile$95,483$89,489
Top Earner (P90)$102,478$104,574
Total Employed1505
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Little Rock ($83,856) and Van Buren ($80,891) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Little RockVan BurenMedian Salary$83,856$80,891Entry Level (P10)$64,951$64,122Top Earner (P90)$102,478$104,574US Median $100,283

Verdict

Little Rock, AR offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Van Buren.

The salary gap between Little Rock and Van Buren is $2,965 (3.67%). Little Rock's median is -16.38% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Little Rock spans $37,527,Van Buren spans $40,452. Van Buren has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Little Rock
P10 (Entry)$64,951
P25$74,277
Median$83,856
P75$95,483
P90 (Top)$102,478
Van Buren
P10 (Entry)$64,122
P25$71,667
Median$80,891
P75$89,489
P90 (Top)$104,574

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Little Rock ($93,836 effective) pays 0.81% more than Van Buren ($93,085 effective).

Little Rock
Nominal: $83,856
CoL Index: 89.364
Adjusted: $93,836
Van Buren
Nominal: $80,891
CoL Index: 86.9
Adjusted: $93,085

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Little Rock if…

  • Higher median salary ($83,856/year)
  • Larger job market (150 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $93,836)
  • You prefer the Arkansas area and lifestyle

Choose Van Buren if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($104,574)
  • You prefer the Arkansas area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Little Rock grew 32.0% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 44.7% growth in Van Buren over the same period.

Little Rock, AR

+32.0%

$60,470 (2019) → $79,840 (2025)

Van Buren, AR

+44.7%

$53,238 (2024) → $77,017 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Little Rock or Van Buren?

Little Rock has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $83,856/year, compared to Van Buren at $80,891/year — a difference of $2,965 (3.67%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Little Rock and Van Buren?

Little Rock magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $40.32/hr while Van Buren hygienists earn $38.89/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Little Rock to Van Buren as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Little Rock and Van Buren. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Little Rock = $93,836, Van Buren = $93,085), job availability (150 vs 5 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Little Rock vs Van Buren?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $64,951 in Little Rock and $64,122 in Van Buren. The Little Rock area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov