MRI Technologist Pay

Manchester vs Salem: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Manchester, NH and Salem, NH. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Manchester, NH
$110,775
$53.26/hr
Salem, NH
$105,006
$50.49/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricManchester, NHSalem, NH
Median Salary$110,775$105,006
Hourly Rate$53.26$50.49
Entry Level (P10)$85,211$75,106
25th Percentile$91,586$87,581
75th Percentile$111,279$114,184
Top Earner (P90)$123,473$133,416
Total Employed1208
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Manchester ($110,775) and Salem ($105,006) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.ManchesterSalemMedian Salary$110,775$105,006Entry Level (P10)$85,211$75,106Top Earner (P90)$123,473$133,416US Median $100,283

Verdict

Manchester, NH offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Salem.

The salary gap between Manchester and Salem is $5,769 (5.49%). Manchester's median is +10.46% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Manchester spans $38,262,Salem spans $58,310. Salem has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Manchester
P10 (Entry)$85,211
P25$91,586
Median$110,775
P75$111,279
P90 (Top)$123,473
Salem
P10 (Entry)$75,106
P25$87,581
Median$105,006
P75$114,184
P90 (Top)$133,416

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Manchester ($104,844 effective) pays 7.13% more than Salem ($97,862 effective).

Manchester
Nominal: $110,775
CoL Index: 105.657
Adjusted: $104,844
Salem
Nominal: $105,006
CoL Index: 107.3
Adjusted: $97,862

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Manchester if…

  • Higher median salary ($110,775/year)
  • Larger job market (120 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $104,844)
  • You prefer the New Hampshire area and lifestyle

Choose Salem if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($133,416)
  • You prefer the New Hampshire area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Manchester grew 31.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 8.5% growth in Salem over the same period.

Manchester, NH

+31.6%

$80,130 (2019) → $105,470 (2025)

Salem, NH

+8.5%

$92,144 (2024) → $99,977 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Manchester or Salem?

Manchester has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $110,775/year, compared to Salem at $105,006/year — a difference of $5,769 (5.49%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Manchester and Salem?

Manchester magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $53.26/hr while Salem hygienists earn $50.49/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Manchester to Salem as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Manchester and Salem. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Manchester = $104,844, Salem = $97,862), job availability (120 vs 8 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Manchester vs Salem?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $85,211 in Manchester and $75,106 in Salem. The Manchester area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov