MRI Technologist Pay

Medford vs Worcester: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Medford, MA and Worcester, MA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Medford, MA
$107,516
$51.69/hr
Worcester, MA
$110,218
$52.99/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMedford, MAWorcester, MA
Median Salary$107,516$110,218
Hourly Rate$51.69$52.99
Entry Level (P10)$81,833$82,953
25th Percentile$93,728$105,639
75th Percentile$117,686$132,170
Top Earner (P90)$145,957$137,411
Total Employed11180
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Medford ($107,516) and Worcester ($110,218) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.MedfordWorcesterMedian Salary$107,516$110,218Entry Level (P10)$81,833$82,953Top Earner (P90)$145,957$137,411US Median $100,283

Verdict

Worcester, MA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Medford.

The salary gap between Medford and Worcester is $2,702 (2.51%). Worcester's median is +9.91% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Medford spans $64,124,Worcester spans $54,458. Medford has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Medford
P10 (Entry)$81,833
P25$93,728
Median$107,516
P75$117,686
P90 (Top)$145,957
Worcester
P10 (Entry)$82,953
P25$105,639
Median$110,218
P75$132,170
P90 (Top)$137,411

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Worcester ($107,506 effective) pays 8.49% more than Medford ($99,093 effective).

Medford
Nominal: $107,516
CoL Index: 108.5
Adjusted: $99,093
Worcester
Nominal: $110,218
CoL Index: 102.523
Adjusted: $107,506

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Medford if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($145,957)
  • You prefer the Massachusetts area and lifestyle

Choose Worcester if…

  • Higher median salary ($110,218/year)
  • Larger job market (180 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $107,506)
  • You prefer the Massachusetts area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Medford grew -6.4% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 22.7% growth in Worcester over the same period.

Medford, MA

+-6.4%

$109,357 (2024) → $102,367 (2025)

Worcester, MA

+22.7%

$85,500 (2019) → $104,940 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Medford or Worcester?

Worcester has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $110,218/year, compared to Medford at $107,516/year — a difference of $2,702 (2.51%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Medford and Worcester?

Medford magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $51.69/hr while Worcester hygienists earn $52.99/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Medford to Worcester as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Medford and Worcester. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Medford = $99,093, Worcester = $107,506), job availability (11 vs 180 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Medford vs Worcester?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $81,833 in Medford and $82,953 in Worcester. The Worcester area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov