MRI Technologist Pay

Needham vs Springfield: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Needham, MA and Springfield, MA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Needham, MA
$106,906
$51.40/hr
Springfield, MA
$111,237
$53.48/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNeedham, MASpringfield, MA
Median Salary$106,906$111,237
Hourly Rate$51.40$53.48
Entry Level (P10)$77,678$86,629
25th Percentile$90,041$104,893
75th Percentile$117,079$134,207
Top Earner (P90)$137,191$164,529
Total Employed660
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Needham ($106,906) and Springfield ($111,237) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.NeedhamSpringfieldMedian Salary$106,906$111,237Entry Level (P10)$77,678$86,629Top Earner (P90)$137,191$164,529US Median $100,283

Verdict

Springfield, MA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Needham.

The salary gap between Needham and Springfield is $4,331 (4.05%). Springfield's median is +10.92% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Needham spans $59,513,Springfield spans $77,900. Springfield has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Needham
P10 (Entry)$77,678
P25$90,041
Median$106,906
P75$117,079
P90 (Top)$137,191
Springfield
P10 (Entry)$86,629
P25$104,893
Median$111,237
P75$134,207
P90 (Top)$164,529

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Springfield ($115,798 effective) pays 17.52% more than Needham ($98,531 effective).

Needham
Nominal: $106,906
CoL Index: 108.5
Adjusted: $98,531
Springfield
Nominal: $111,237
CoL Index: 96.061
Adjusted: $115,798

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Needham if…

  • You prefer the Massachusetts area and lifestyle

Choose Springfield if…

  • Higher median salary ($111,237/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($164,529)
  • Larger job market (60 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $115,798)
  • You prefer the Massachusetts area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Needham grew -6.4% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 25.5% growth in Springfield over the same period.

Needham, MA

+-6.4%

$108,737 (2024) → $101,786 (2025)

Springfield, MA

+25.5%

$84,370 (2019) → $105,910 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Needham or Springfield?

Springfield has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $111,237/year, compared to Needham at $106,906/year — a difference of $4,331 (4.05%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Needham and Springfield?

Needham magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $51.40/hr while Springfield hygienists earn $53.48/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Needham to Springfield as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Needham and Springfield. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Needham = $98,531, Springfield = $115,798), job availability (6 vs 60 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Needham vs Springfield?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $77,678 in Needham and $86,629 in Springfield. The Springfield area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov