MRI Technologist Pay

New Haven vs Norwich: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between New Haven, CT and Norwich, CT. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

New Haven, CT
$114,241
$54.92/hr
Norwich, CT
$104,870
$50.41/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNew Haven, CTNorwich, CT
Median Salary$114,241$104,870
Hourly Rate$54.92$50.41
Entry Level (P10)$85,106$73,819
25th Percentile$95,703$90,626
75th Percentile$124,366$117,081
Top Earner (P90)$138,451$138,242
Total Employed1108
Side-by-side bar chart comparing New Haven ($114,241) and Norwich ($104,870) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.New HavenNorwichMedian Salary$114,241$104,870Entry Level (P10)$85,106$73,819Top Earner (P90)$138,451$138,242US Median $100,283

Verdict

New Haven, CT offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Norwich.

The salary gap between New Haven and Norwich is $9,371 (8.94%). New Haven's median is +13.92% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in New Haven spans $53,345,Norwich spans $64,423. Norwich has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

New Haven
P10 (Entry)$85,106
P25$95,703
Median$114,241
P75$124,366
P90 (Top)$138,451
Norwich
P10 (Entry)$73,819
P25$90,626
Median$104,870
P75$117,081
P90 (Top)$138,242

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, New Haven ($109,260 effective) pays 12.42% more than Norwich ($97,192 effective).

New Haven
Nominal: $114,241
CoL Index: 104.559
Adjusted: $109,260
Norwich
Nominal: $104,870
CoL Index: 107.9
Adjusted: $97,192

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose New Haven if…

  • Higher median salary ($114,241/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($138,451)
  • Larger job market (110 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $109,260)
  • You prefer the Connecticut area and lifestyle

Choose Norwich if…

  • You prefer the Connecticut area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in New Haven grew 51.7% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 1.6% growth in Norwich over the same period.

New Haven, CT

+51.7%

$71,720 (2019) → $108,770 (2025)

Norwich, CT

+1.6%

$98,301 (2024) → $99,848 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: New Haven or Norwich?

New Haven has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $114,241/year, compared to Norwich at $104,870/year — a difference of $9,371 (8.94%).

What is the hourly rate difference between New Haven and Norwich?

New Haven magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $54.92/hr while Norwich hygienists earn $50.41/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from New Haven to Norwich as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing New Haven and Norwich. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: New Haven = $109,260, Norwich = $97,192), job availability (110 vs 8 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in New Haven vs Norwich?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $85,106 in New Haven and $73,819 in Norwich. The New Haven area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov