MRI Technologist Pay

Newark vs Piscataway: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Newark, NJ and Piscataway, NJ. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Newark, NJ
$124,497
$59.86/hr
Piscataway, NJ
$114,879
$55.24/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNewark, NJPiscataway, NJ
Median Salary$124,497$114,879
Hourly Rate$59.86$55.24
Entry Level (P10)$81,519$79,527
25th Percentile$106,406$94,125
75th Percentile$144,917$130,906
Top Earner (P90)$178,674$157,698
Total Employed6114
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Newark ($124,497) and Piscataway ($114,879) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.NewarkPiscatawayMedian Salary$124,497$114,879Entry Level (P10)$81,519$79,527Top Earner (P90)$178,674$157,698US Median $100,283

Verdict

Newark, NJ offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Piscataway.

The salary gap between Newark and Piscataway is $9,618 (8.37%). Newark's median is +24.15% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Newark spans $97,155,Piscataway spans $78,171. Newark has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Newark
P10 (Entry)$81,519
P25$106,406
Median$124,497
P75$144,917
P90 (Top)$178,674
Piscataway
P10 (Entry)$79,527
P25$94,125
Median$114,879
P75$130,906
P90 (Top)$157,698

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Newark ($108,070 effective) pays 8.37% more than Piscataway ($99,721 effective).

Newark
Nominal: $124,497
CoL Index: 115.2
Adjusted: $108,070
Piscataway
Nominal: $114,879
CoL Index: 115.2
Adjusted: $99,721

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Newark if…

  • Higher median salary ($124,497/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($178,674)
  • Larger job market (61 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $108,070)
  • You prefer the New Jersey area and lifestyle

Choose Piscataway if…

  • You prefer the New Jersey area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Newark grew 4.1% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 1.6% growth in Piscataway over the same period.

Newark, NJ

+4.1%

$113,871 (2024) → $118,535 (2025)

Piscataway, NJ

+1.6%

$107,681 (2024) → $109,377 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Newark or Piscataway?

Newark has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $124,497/year, compared to Piscataway at $114,879/year — a difference of $9,618 (8.37%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Newark and Piscataway?

Newark magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $59.86/hr while Piscataway hygienists earn $55.24/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Newark to Piscataway as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Newark and Piscataway. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Newark = $108,070, Piscataway = $99,721), job availability (61 vs 14 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Newark vs Piscataway?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $81,519 in Newark and $79,527 in Piscataway. The Newark area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov