MRI Technologist Pay

Newark vs Washington Township: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Newark, NJ and Washington Township, NJ. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Newark, NJ
$124,497
$59.86/hr
Washington Township, NJ
$114,206
$54.91/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNewark, NJWashington Township, NJ
Median Salary$124,497$114,206
Hourly Rate$59.86$54.91
Entry Level (P10)$81,519$83,797
25th Percentile$106,406$97,058
75th Percentile$144,917$125,873
Top Earner (P90)$178,674$148,297
Total Employed6112
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Newark ($124,497) and Washington Township ($114,206) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.NewarkWashington TownshipMedian Salary$124,497$114,206Entry Level (P10)$81,519$83,797Top Earner (P90)$178,674$148,297US Median $100,283

Verdict

Newark, NJ offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Washington Township.

The salary gap between Newark and Washington Township is $10,291 (9.01%). Newark's median is +24.15% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Newark spans $97,155,Washington Township spans $64,500. Newark has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Newark
P10 (Entry)$81,519
P25$106,406
Median$124,497
P75$144,917
P90 (Top)$178,674
Washington Township
P10 (Entry)$83,797
P25$97,058
Median$114,206
P75$125,873
P90 (Top)$148,297

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Newark ($108,070 effective) pays 9.01% more than Washington Township ($99,137 effective).

Newark
Nominal: $124,497
CoL Index: 115.2
Adjusted: $108,070
Washington Township
Nominal: $114,206
CoL Index: 115.2
Adjusted: $99,137

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Newark if…

  • Higher median salary ($124,497/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($178,674)
  • Larger job market (61 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $108,070)
  • You prefer the New Jersey area and lifestyle

Choose Washington Township if…

  • You prefer the New Jersey area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Newark grew 4.1% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 1.6% growth in Washington Township over the same period.

Newark, NJ

+4.1%

$113,871 (2024) → $118,535 (2025)

Washington Township, NJ

+1.6%

$107,052 (2024) → $108,737 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Newark or Washington Township?

Newark has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $124,497/year, compared to Washington Township at $114,206/year — a difference of $10,291 (9.01%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Newark and Washington Township?

Newark magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $59.86/hr while Washington Township hygienists earn $54.91/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Newark to Washington Township as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Newark and Washington Township. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Newark = $108,070, Washington Township = $99,137), job availability (61 vs 12 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Newark vs Washington Township?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $81,519 in Newark and $83,797 in Washington Township. The Washington Township area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov