MRI Technologist Pay

Plymouth vs Springfield: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Plymouth, MA and Springfield, MA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Plymouth, MA
$109,550
$52.67/hr
Springfield, MA
$111,237
$53.48/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPlymouth, MASpringfield, MA
Median Salary$109,550$111,237
Hourly Rate$52.67$53.48
Entry Level (P10)$78,039$86,629
25th Percentile$91,411$104,893
75th Percentile$122,311$134,207
Top Earner (P90)$146,178$164,529
Total Employed960
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Plymouth ($109,550) and Springfield ($111,237) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.PlymouthSpringfieldMedian Salary$109,550$111,237Entry Level (P10)$78,039$86,629Top Earner (P90)$146,178$164,529US Median $100,283

Verdict

Springfield, MA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Plymouth.

The salary gap between Plymouth and Springfield is $1,687 (1.54%). Springfield's median is +10.92% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Plymouth spans $68,139,Springfield spans $77,900. Springfield has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Plymouth
P10 (Entry)$78,039
P25$91,411
Median$109,550
P75$122,311
P90 (Top)$146,178
Springfield
P10 (Entry)$86,629
P25$104,893
Median$111,237
P75$134,207
P90 (Top)$164,529

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Springfield ($115,798 effective) pays 14.69% more than Plymouth ($100,968 effective).

Plymouth
Nominal: $109,550
CoL Index: 108.5
Adjusted: $100,968
Springfield
Nominal: $111,237
CoL Index: 96.061
Adjusted: $115,798

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Plymouth if…

  • You prefer the Massachusetts area and lifestyle

Choose Springfield if…

  • Higher median salary ($111,237/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($164,529)
  • Larger job market (60 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $115,798)
  • You prefer the Massachusetts area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Plymouth grew -6.4% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 25.5% growth in Springfield over the same period.

Plymouth, MA

+-6.4%

$111,426 (2024) → $104,304 (2025)

Springfield, MA

+25.5%

$84,370 (2019) → $105,910 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Plymouth or Springfield?

Springfield has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $111,237/year, compared to Plymouth at $109,550/year — a difference of $1,687 (1.54%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Plymouth and Springfield?

Plymouth magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $52.67/hr while Springfield hygienists earn $53.48/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Plymouth to Springfield as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Plymouth and Springfield. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Plymouth = $100,968, Springfield = $115,798), job availability (9 vs 60 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Plymouth vs Springfield?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $78,039 in Plymouth and $86,629 in Springfield. The Springfield area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov