MRI Technologist Pay

Seattle vs Kent: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Seattle, WA and Kent, WA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Seattle, WA
$137,022
$65.87/hr
Kent, WA
$107,515
$51.69/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSeattle, WAKent, WA
Median Salary$137,022$107,515
Hourly Rate$65.87$51.69
Entry Level (P10)$104,904$78,691
25th Percentile$130,542$91,557
75th Percentile$164,572$124,015
Top Earner (P90)$171,924$151,015
Total Employed46033
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Seattle ($137,022) and Kent ($107,515) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.SeattleKentMedian Salary$137,022$107,515Entry Level (P10)$104,904$78,691Top Earner (P90)$171,924$151,015US Median $100,283

Verdict

Seattle, WA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Kent.

The salary gap between Seattle and Kent is $29,507 (27.44%). Seattle's median is +36.64% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Seattle spans $67,020,Kent spans $72,324. Kent has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Seattle
P10 (Entry)$104,904
P25$130,542
Median$137,022
P75$164,572
P90 (Top)$171,924
Kent
P10 (Entry)$78,691
P25$91,557
Median$107,515
P75$124,015
P90 (Top)$151,015

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Seattle ($123,296 effective) pays 23.16% more than Kent ($100,107 effective).

Seattle
Nominal: $137,022
CoL Index: 111.133
Adjusted: $123,296
Kent
Nominal: $107,515
CoL Index: 107.4
Adjusted: $100,107

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Seattle if…

  • Higher median salary ($137,022/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($171,924)
  • Larger job market (460 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $123,296)
  • You prefer the Washington area and lifestyle

Choose Kent if…

  • You prefer the Washington area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Seattle grew 28.2% from 2019 to 2025, compared to -11.6% growth in Kent over the same period.

Seattle, WA

+28.2%

$101,780 (2019) → $130,460 (2025)

Kent, WA

+-11.6%

$115,788 (2024) → $102,366 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Seattle or Kent?

Seattle has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $137,022/year, compared to Kent at $107,515/year — a difference of $29,507 (27.44%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Seattle and Kent?

Seattle magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $65.87/hr while Kent hygienists earn $51.69/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Seattle to Kent as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Seattle and Kent. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Seattle = $123,296, Kent = $100,107), job availability (460 vs 33 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Seattle vs Kent?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $104,904 in Seattle and $78,691 in Kent. The Seattle area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov