MRI Technologist Pay

South Kingstown vs Warwick: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between South Kingstown, RI and Warwick, RI. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

South Kingstown, RI
$95,668
$45.99/hr
Warwick, RI
$115,358
$55.46/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSouth Kingstown, RIWarwick, RI
Median Salary$95,668$115,358
Hourly Rate$45.99$55.46
Entry Level (P10)$71,684$82,309
25th Percentile$82,403$96,710
75th Percentile$106,508$129,248
Top Earner (P90)$125,976$154,683
Total Employed516
Side-by-side bar chart comparing South Kingstown ($95,668) and Warwick ($115,358) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.South KingstownWarwickMedian Salary$95,668$115,358Entry Level (P10)$71,684$82,309Top Earner (P90)$125,976$154,683US Median $100,283

Verdict

Warwick, RI offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to South Kingstown.

The salary gap between South Kingstown and Warwick is $19,690 (20.58%). Warwick's median is +15.03% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in South Kingstown spans $54,292,Warwick spans $72,374. Warwick has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

South Kingstown
P10 (Entry)$71,684
P25$82,403
Median$95,668
P75$106,508
P90 (Top)$125,976
Warwick
P10 (Entry)$82,309
P25$96,710
Median$115,358
P75$129,248
P90 (Top)$154,683

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Warwick ($114,784 effective) pays 20.58% more than South Kingstown ($95,192 effective).

South Kingstown
Nominal: $95,668
CoL Index: 100.5
Adjusted: $95,192
Warwick
Nominal: $115,358
CoL Index: 100.5
Adjusted: $114,784

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose South Kingstown if…

  • You prefer the Rhode Island area and lifestyle

Choose Warwick if…

  • Higher median salary ($115,358/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($154,683)
  • Larger job market (16 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $114,784)
  • You prefer the Rhode Island area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in South Kingstown grew 8.5% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 23.0% growth in Warwick over the same period.

South Kingstown, RI

+8.5%

$83,951 (2024) → $91,086 (2025)

Warwick, RI

+23.0%

$89,331 (2024) → $109,833 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: South Kingstown or Warwick?

Warwick has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $115,358/year, compared to South Kingstown at $95,668/year — a difference of $19,690 (20.58%).

What is the hourly rate difference between South Kingstown and Warwick?

South Kingstown magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $45.99/hr while Warwick hygienists earn $55.46/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from South Kingstown to Warwick as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing South Kingstown and Warwick. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: South Kingstown = $95,192, Warwick = $114,784), job availability (5 vs 16 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in South Kingstown vs Warwick?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $71,684 in South Kingstown and $82,309 in Warwick. The Warwick area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov