MRI Technologist Pay

Springfield vs Worcester: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Springfield, MA and Worcester, MA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Springfield, MA
$111,237
$53.48/hr
Worcester, MA
$110,218
$52.99/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSpringfield, MAWorcester, MA
Median Salary$111,237$110,218
Hourly Rate$53.48$52.99
Entry Level (P10)$86,629$82,953
25th Percentile$104,893$105,639
75th Percentile$134,207$132,170
Top Earner (P90)$164,529$137,411
Total Employed60180
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Springfield ($111,237) and Worcester ($110,218) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.SpringfieldWorcesterMedian Salary$111,237$110,218Entry Level (P10)$86,629$82,953Top Earner (P90)$164,529$137,411US Median $100,283

Verdict

Springfield, MA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Worcester.

The salary gap between Springfield and Worcester is $1,019 (0.92%). Springfield's median is +10.92% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Springfield spans $77,900,Worcester spans $54,458. Springfield has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Springfield
P10 (Entry)$86,629
P25$104,893
Median$111,237
P75$134,207
P90 (Top)$164,529
Worcester
P10 (Entry)$82,953
P25$105,639
Median$110,218
P75$132,170
P90 (Top)$137,411

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Springfield ($115,798 effective) pays 7.71% more than Worcester ($107,506 effective).

Springfield
Nominal: $111,237
CoL Index: 96.061
Adjusted: $115,798
Worcester
Nominal: $110,218
CoL Index: 102.523
Adjusted: $107,506

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Springfield if…

  • Higher median salary ($111,237/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($164,529)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $115,798)
  • You prefer the Massachusetts area and lifestyle

Choose Worcester if…

  • Larger job market (180 employed)
  • You prefer the Massachusetts area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Springfield grew 25.5% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 22.7% growth in Worcester over the same period.

Springfield, MA

+25.5%

$84,370 (2019) → $105,910 (2025)

Worcester, MA

+22.7%

$85,500 (2019) → $104,940 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Springfield or Worcester?

Springfield has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $111,237/year, compared to Worcester at $110,218/year — a difference of $1,019 (0.92%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Springfield and Worcester?

Springfield magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $53.48/hr while Worcester hygienists earn $52.99/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Springfield to Worcester as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Springfield and Worcester. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Springfield = $115,798, Worcester = $107,506), job availability (60 vs 180 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Springfield vs Worcester?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $86,629 in Springfield and $82,953 in Worcester. The Springfield area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov