MRI Technologist Pay

Castle Rock vs Colorado Springs: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Castle Rock, CO and Colorado Springs, CO. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Castle Rock, CO
$103,722
$49.87/hr
Colorado Springs, CO
$106,448
$51.18/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCastle Rock, COColorado Springs, CO
Median Salary$103,722$106,448
Hourly Rate$49.87$51.18
Entry Level (P10)$78,110$83,824
25th Percentile$90,033$95,619
75th Percentile$113,066$116,132
Top Earner (P90)$133,837$117,045
Total Employed1480
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Castle Rock ($103,722) and Colorado Springs ($106,448) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Castle RockColorado SpringsMedian Salary$103,722$106,448Entry Level (P10)$78,110$83,824Top Earner (P90)$133,837$117,045US Median $100,283

Verdict

Colorado Springs, CO offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Castle Rock.

The salary gap between Castle Rock and Colorado Springs is $2,726 (2.63%). Colorado Springs's median is +6.15% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Castle Rock spans $55,727,Colorado Springs spans $33,221. Castle Rock has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Castle Rock
P10 (Entry)$78,110
P25$90,033
Median$103,722
P75$113,066
P90 (Top)$133,837
Colorado Springs
P10 (Entry)$83,824
P25$95,619
Median$106,448
P75$116,132
P90 (Top)$117,045

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Colorado Springs ($105,701 effective) pays 7.00% more than Castle Rock ($98,783 effective).

Castle Rock
Nominal: $103,722
CoL Index: 105
Adjusted: $98,783
Colorado Springs
Nominal: $106,448
CoL Index: 100.707
Adjusted: $105,701

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Castle Rock if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($133,837)
  • You prefer the Colorado area and lifestyle

Choose Colorado Springs if…

  • Higher median salary ($106,448/year)
  • Larger job market (80 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $105,701)
  • You prefer the Colorado area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Castle Rock grew 6.1% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 40.1% growth in Colorado Springs over the same period.

Castle Rock, CO

+6.1%

$93,087 (2024) → $98,755 (2025)

Colorado Springs, CO

+40.1%

$72,350 (2019) → $101,350 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Castle Rock or Colorado Springs?

Colorado Springs has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $106,448/year, compared to Castle Rock at $103,722/year — a difference of $2,726 (2.63%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Castle Rock and Colorado Springs?

Castle Rock magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $49.87/hr while Colorado Springs hygienists earn $51.18/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Castle Rock to Colorado Springs as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Castle Rock and Colorado Springs. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Castle Rock = $98,783, Colorado Springs = $105,701), job availability (14 vs 80 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Castle Rock vs Colorado Springs?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $78,110 in Castle Rock and $83,824 in Colorado Springs. The Colorado Springs area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov