MRI Technologist Pay

Colorado Springs vs Louisville: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Colorado Springs, CO and Louisville, CO. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Colorado Springs, CO
$106,448
$51.18/hr
Louisville, CO
$98,089
$47.16/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricColorado Springs, COLouisville, CO
Median Salary$106,448$98,089
Hourly Rate$51.18$47.16
Entry Level (P10)$83,824$75,189
25th Percentile$95,619$85,117
75th Percentile$116,132$106,908
Top Earner (P90)$117,045$123,857
Total Employed806
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Colorado Springs ($106,448) and Louisville ($98,089) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Colorado SpringsLouisvilleMedian Salary$106,448$98,089Entry Level (P10)$83,824$75,189Top Earner (P90)$117,045$123,857US Median $100,283

Verdict

Colorado Springs, CO offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Louisville.

The salary gap between Colorado Springs and Louisville is $8,359 (8.52%). Colorado Springs's median is +6.15% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Colorado Springs spans $33,221,Louisville spans $48,668. Louisville has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Colorado Springs
P10 (Entry)$83,824
P25$95,619
Median$106,448
P75$116,132
P90 (Top)$117,045
Louisville
P10 (Entry)$75,189
P25$85,117
Median$98,089
P75$106,908
P90 (Top)$123,857

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Colorado Springs ($105,701 effective) pays 13.15% more than Louisville ($93,418 effective).

Colorado Springs
Nominal: $106,448
CoL Index: 100.707
Adjusted: $105,701
Louisville
Nominal: $98,089
CoL Index: 105
Adjusted: $93,418

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Colorado Springs if…

  • Higher median salary ($106,448/year)
  • Larger job market (80 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $105,701)
  • You prefer the Colorado area and lifestyle

Choose Louisville if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($123,857)
  • You prefer the Colorado area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Colorado Springs grew 40.1% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 6.1% growth in Louisville over the same period.

Colorado Springs, CO

+40.1%

$72,350 (2019) → $101,350 (2025)

Louisville, CO

+6.1%

$88,031 (2024) → $93,391 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Colorado Springs or Louisville?

Colorado Springs has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $106,448/year, compared to Louisville at $98,089/year — a difference of $8,359 (8.52%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Colorado Springs and Louisville?

Colorado Springs magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $51.18/hr while Louisville hygienists earn $47.16/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Colorado Springs to Louisville as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Colorado Springs and Louisville. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Colorado Springs = $105,701, Louisville = $93,418), job availability (80 vs 6 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Colorado Springs vs Louisville?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $83,824 in Colorado Springs and $75,189 in Louisville. The Colorado Springs area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov