MRI Technologist Pay

Columbus vs Cuyahoga Falls: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Columbus, OH and Cuyahoga Falls, OH. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Columbus, OH
$95,084
$45.71/hr
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
$93,324
$44.87/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricColumbus, OHCuyahoga Falls, OH
Median Salary$95,084$93,324
Hourly Rate$45.71$44.87
Entry Level (P10)$80,400$65,656
25th Percentile$85,589$77,539
75th Percentile$106,984$101,820
Top Earner (P90)$108,475$120,569
Total Employed38011
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Columbus ($95,084) and Cuyahoga Falls ($93,324) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.ColumbusCuyahoga FallsMedian Salary$95,084$93,324Entry Level (P10)$80,400$65,656Top Earner (P90)$108,475$120,569US Median $100,283

Verdict

Columbus, OH offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Cuyahoga Falls.

The salary gap between Columbus and Cuyahoga Falls is $1,760 (1.89%). Columbus's median is -5.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Columbus spans $28,075,Cuyahoga Falls spans $54,913. Cuyahoga Falls has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Columbus
P10 (Entry)$80,400
P25$85,589
Median$95,084
P75$106,984
P90 (Top)$108,475
Cuyahoga Falls
P10 (Entry)$65,656
P25$77,539
Median$93,324
P75$101,820
P90 (Top)$120,569

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Cuyahoga Falls ($102,893 effective) pays 3.31% more than Columbus ($99,597 effective).

Columbus
Nominal: $95,084
CoL Index: 95.469
Adjusted: $99,597
Cuyahoga Falls
Nominal: $93,324
CoL Index: 90.7
Adjusted: $102,893

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Columbus if…

  • Higher median salary ($95,084/year)
  • Larger job market (380 employed)
  • You prefer the Ohio area and lifestyle

Choose Cuyahoga Falls if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($120,569)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $102,893)
  • You prefer the Ohio area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Columbus grew 30.0% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 28.4% growth in Cuyahoga Falls over the same period.

Columbus, OH

+30.0%

$69,650 (2019) → $90,530 (2025)

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

+28.4%

$69,201 (2024) → $88,855 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Columbus or Cuyahoga Falls?

Columbus has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $95,084/year, compared to Cuyahoga Falls at $93,324/year — a difference of $1,760 (1.89%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Columbus and Cuyahoga Falls?

Columbus magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $45.71/hr while Cuyahoga Falls hygienists earn $44.87/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Columbus to Cuyahoga Falls as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Columbus and Cuyahoga Falls. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Columbus = $99,597, Cuyahoga Falls = $102,893), job availability (380 vs 11 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Columbus vs Cuyahoga Falls?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $80,400 in Columbus and $65,656 in Cuyahoga Falls. The Columbus area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov