MRI Technologist Pay

Columbus vs Lancaster: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Columbus, OH and Lancaster, OH. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Columbus, OH
$95,084
$45.71/hr
Lancaster, OH
$92,341
$44.40/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricColumbus, OHLancaster, OH
Median Salary$95,084$92,341
Hourly Rate$45.71$44.40
Entry Level (P10)$80,400$68,887
25th Percentile$85,589$79,026
75th Percentile$106,984$102,307
Top Earner (P90)$108,475$120,779
Total Employed3807
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Columbus ($95,084) and Lancaster ($92,341) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.ColumbusLancasterMedian Salary$95,084$92,341Entry Level (P10)$80,400$68,887Top Earner (P90)$108,475$120,779US Median $100,283

Verdict

Columbus, OH offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Lancaster.

The salary gap between Columbus and Lancaster is $2,743 (2.97%). Columbus's median is -5.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Columbus spans $28,075,Lancaster spans $51,892. Lancaster has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Columbus
P10 (Entry)$80,400
P25$85,589
Median$95,084
P75$106,984
P90 (Top)$108,475
Lancaster
P10 (Entry)$68,887
P25$79,026
Median$92,341
P75$102,307
P90 (Top)$120,779

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Lancaster ($101,809 effective) pays 2.22% more than Columbus ($99,597 effective).

Columbus
Nominal: $95,084
CoL Index: 95.469
Adjusted: $99,597
Lancaster
Nominal: $92,341
CoL Index: 90.7
Adjusted: $101,809

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Columbus if…

  • Higher median salary ($95,084/year)
  • Larger job market (380 employed)
  • You prefer the Ohio area and lifestyle

Choose Lancaster if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($120,779)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $101,809)
  • You prefer the Ohio area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Columbus grew 30.0% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 28.4% growth in Lancaster over the same period.

Columbus, OH

+30.0%

$69,650 (2019) → $90,530 (2025)

Lancaster, OH

+28.4%

$68,471 (2024) → $87,919 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Columbus or Lancaster?

Columbus has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $95,084/year, compared to Lancaster at $92,341/year — a difference of $2,743 (2.97%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Columbus and Lancaster?

Columbus magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $45.71/hr while Lancaster hygienists earn $44.40/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Columbus to Lancaster as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Columbus and Lancaster. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Columbus = $99,597, Lancaster = $101,809), job availability (380 vs 7 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Columbus vs Lancaster?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $80,400 in Columbus and $68,887 in Lancaster. The Columbus area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov