MRI Technologist Pay

Columbus vs North Olmsted: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Columbus, OH and North Olmsted, OH. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Columbus, OH
$95,084
$45.71/hr
North Olmsted, OH
$90,984
$43.74/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricColumbus, OHNorth Olmsted, OH
Median Salary$95,084$90,984
Hourly Rate$45.71$43.74
Entry Level (P10)$80,400$65,617
25th Percentile$85,589$76,197
75th Percentile$106,984$97,225
Top Earner (P90)$108,475$121,956
Total Employed3808
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Columbus ($95,084) and North Olmsted ($90,984) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.ColumbusNorth OlmstedMedian Salary$95,084$90,984Entry Level (P10)$80,400$65,617Top Earner (P90)$108,475$121,956US Median $100,283

Verdict

Columbus, OH offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to North Olmsted.

The salary gap between Columbus and North Olmsted is $4,100 (4.51%). Columbus's median is -5.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Columbus spans $28,075,North Olmsted spans $56,339. North Olmsted has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Columbus
P10 (Entry)$80,400
P25$85,589
Median$95,084
P75$106,984
P90 (Top)$108,475
North Olmsted
P10 (Entry)$65,617
P25$76,197
Median$90,984
P75$97,225
P90 (Top)$121,956

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, North Olmsted ($100,313 effective) pays 0.72% more than Columbus ($99,597 effective).

Columbus
Nominal: $95,084
CoL Index: 95.469
Adjusted: $99,597
North Olmsted
Nominal: $90,984
CoL Index: 90.7
Adjusted: $100,313

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Columbus if…

  • Higher median salary ($95,084/year)
  • Larger job market (380 employed)
  • You prefer the Ohio area and lifestyle

Choose North Olmsted if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($121,956)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $100,313)
  • You prefer the Ohio area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Columbus grew 30.0% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 28.4% growth in North Olmsted over the same period.

Columbus, OH

+30.0%

$69,650 (2019) → $90,530 (2025)

North Olmsted, OH

+28.4%

$67,466 (2024) → $86,627 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Columbus or North Olmsted?

Columbus has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $95,084/year, compared to North Olmsted at $90,984/year — a difference of $4,100 (4.51%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Columbus and North Olmsted?

Columbus magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $45.71/hr while North Olmsted hygienists earn $43.74/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Columbus to North Olmsted as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Columbus and North Olmsted. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Columbus = $99,597, North Olmsted = $100,313), job availability (380 vs 8 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Columbus vs North Olmsted?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $80,400 in Columbus and $65,617 in North Olmsted. The Columbus area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov