MRI Technologist Pay

Concord vs Merrimack: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Concord, NH and Merrimack, NH. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Concord, NH
$102,533
$49.29/hr
Merrimack, NH
$104,872
$50.41/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricConcord, NHMerrimack, NH
Median Salary$102,533$104,872
Hourly Rate$49.29$50.41
Entry Level (P10)$77,898$74,790
25th Percentile$88,787$87,286
75th Percentile$114,608$113,880
Top Earner (P90)$135,765$132,987
Total Employed115
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Concord ($102,533) and Merrimack ($104,872) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.ConcordMerrimackMedian Salary$102,533$104,872Entry Level (P10)$77,898$74,790Top Earner (P90)$135,765$132,987US Median $100,283

Verdict

Concord and Merrimack are closely matched on overall magnetic resonance imaging technologist compensation, each winning on different metrics.

The salary gap between Concord and Merrimack is $2,339 (2.28%). Merrimack's median is +4.58% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Concord spans $57,867,Merrimack spans $58,197. Merrimack has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Concord
P10 (Entry)$77,898
P25$88,787
Median$102,533
P75$114,608
P90 (Top)$135,765
Merrimack
P10 (Entry)$74,790
P25$87,286
Median$104,872
P75$113,880
P90 (Top)$132,987

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Merrimack ($97,737 effective) pays 2.28% more than Concord ($95,557 effective).

Concord
Nominal: $102,533
CoL Index: 107.3
Adjusted: $95,557
Merrimack
Nominal: $104,872
CoL Index: 107.3
Adjusted: $97,737

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Concord if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($135,765)
  • Larger job market (11 employed)
  • You prefer the New Hampshire area and lifestyle

Choose Merrimack if…

  • Higher median salary ($104,872/year)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $97,737)
  • You prefer the New Hampshire area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Concord grew 8.5% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 8.5% growth in Merrimack over the same period.

Concord, NH

+8.5%

$89,976 (2024) → $97,623 (2025)

Merrimack, NH

+8.5%

$92,027 (2024) → $99,850 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Concord or Merrimack?

Merrimack has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $104,872/year, compared to Concord at $102,533/year — a difference of $2,339 (2.28%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Concord and Merrimack?

Concord magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $49.29/hr while Merrimack hygienists earn $50.41/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Concord to Merrimack as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Concord and Merrimack. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Concord = $95,557, Merrimack = $97,737), job availability (11 vs 5 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Concord vs Merrimack?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $77,898 in Concord and $74,790 in Merrimack. The Concord area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov