MRI Technologist Pay

Kirkland vs Tacoma: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Kirkland, WA and Tacoma, WA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Kirkland, WA
$107,340
$51.60/hr
Tacoma, WA
$134,737
$64.78/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricKirkland, WATacoma, WA
Median Salary$107,340$134,737
Hourly Rate$51.60$64.78
Entry Level (P10)$74,582$94,630
25th Percentile$88,236$112,292
75th Percentile$118,554$156,902
Top Earner (P90)$140,669$192,939
Total Employed1356
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Kirkland ($107,340) and Tacoma ($134,737) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.KirklandTacomaMedian Salary$107,340$134,737Entry Level (P10)$74,582$94,630Top Earner (P90)$140,669$192,939US Median $100,283

Verdict

Tacoma, WA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Kirkland.

The salary gap between Kirkland and Tacoma is $27,397 (25.52%). Tacoma's median is +34.36% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Kirkland spans $66,087,Tacoma spans $98,309. Tacoma has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Kirkland
P10 (Entry)$74,582
P25$88,236
Median$107,340
P75$118,554
P90 (Top)$140,669
Tacoma
P10 (Entry)$94,630
P25$112,292
Median$134,737
P75$156,902
P90 (Top)$192,939

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Tacoma ($125,453 effective) pays 25.52% more than Kirkland ($99,944 effective).

Kirkland
Nominal: $107,340
CoL Index: 107.4
Adjusted: $99,944
Tacoma
Nominal: $134,737
CoL Index: 107.4
Adjusted: $125,453

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Kirkland if…

  • You prefer the Washington area and lifestyle

Choose Tacoma if…

  • Higher median salary ($134,737/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($192,939)
  • Larger job market (56 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $125,453)
  • You prefer the Washington area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Kirkland grew -11.6% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 9.2% growth in Tacoma over the same period.

Kirkland, WA

+-11.6%

$115,599 (2024) → $102,199 (2025)

Tacoma, WA

+9.2%

$117,479 (2024) → $128,284 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Kirkland or Tacoma?

Tacoma has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $134,737/year, compared to Kirkland at $107,340/year — a difference of $27,397 (25.52%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Kirkland and Tacoma?

Kirkland magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $51.60/hr while Tacoma hygienists earn $64.78/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Kirkland to Tacoma as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Kirkland and Tacoma. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Kirkland = $99,944, Tacoma = $125,453), job availability (13 vs 56 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Kirkland vs Tacoma?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $74,582 in Kirkland and $94,630 in Tacoma. The Tacoma area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov